Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups


NoVaMoMe 2024: 06/08/2024
Arlington, VA
Registration Is Open!


Texas MoMe 2024: 10/18/2024-10/19/2024 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















Obama: Let's Cap Executive Pay At Bailed Out Firms At $500K | Main | Web Ad: Fix Housing First
February 04, 2009

Bullshit Lancet Suvey Re: "Excess Deaths" in Iraq Rebuked by Professional Panel for Nondisclosure of Methods

Finally debunked. Wow, that Lightworker really has ushered in a new era of sound science.

In a highly unusual rebuke, the American Association for Public Opinion Research said this morning that the author of a widely debated survey on "excess deaths" in Iraq had violated its code of professional ethics by refusing to disclose details of his work.


In an eight-month investigation, Gilbert Burnham, a faculty member at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore, "repeatedly refused to make public essential facts about his research on civilian deaths in Iraq," AAPOR said in a statement.

The association said it had focused on Burnham's study, published in the October 2006 issue of the British medical journal Lancet, reporting an estimated 654,965 "excess deaths" in Iraq as a result of the U.S.-led invasion in 2003. A 2004 report, in which Burnham also participated, estimated approximately 98,000 excess deaths to that point.

In its news release on the 2006 study, the Lancet said, "The mortality survey used well-established and scientifically proven methods for measuring mortality and disease in populations."

AAPOR's standards committee chair, Mary E. Losch, said the association, acting on a member's complaint, had formally requested from Burnham "basic information about his survey, including, for example, the wording of questions he used, instructions and explanations that were provided to respondents, and a summary of the outcomes for all households selected as potential participants in the survey."

Losch said Burnham gave some partial answers but "explicitly refused to provide complete information about the basic elements of his research."

In related news, I'm penning a study for the Lancet stating that there have been ninety-six bazillion "excess tears" in America due to The One's broken promises.

Peer Reviewed? Um, how did this survey get published in the first place without these sorts of basic disclosures? How can one peer review something without fundamental information about data collected and methods?

Gee, it's almost as the scientensia put politics ahead of actual science.



digg this
posted by Ace at 01:04 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
Angzarr the Cromulent: "As Scottie Scheffler has found out, some cops are ..."

TRex: "300 122 What kid wouldn't love to have a birthday ..."

Cara Delevingne: "[i]I wonder if at one time her eyebrows were one?[ ..."

Common Tater: "Tuna, I would be willing to bet “Scrotum Sel ..."

Diogenes: "Cute girl describing her date. Very cute. Post ..."

French Knight: "Now go away or I shall taunt you a second time! ..."

browndog has nightmares of Dracula: "Cats vs Rags for the Eastern Conference title J ..."

BillyD: "[i]122 What kid wouldn't love to have a birthday p ..."

JackStraw: ">>I'm very worried about it. Crotona Park is in a ..."

browndog has nightmares of Dracula: "and the Cuyohoga had an octane rating Posted by: ..."

Cicero (@cicero43): "Doune Castle in Scotland was the actual location o ..."

Ciampino - Kaff #07: "269 I think it's "What are you doing?" Posted by: ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64