Sponsored Content

Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

More Good News... Report: Iran Getting Close To Having Enough Enriched Uranium For A Weapon And The US Is Looking Forward To Talking To Them About It | Main | Obama: 'No compromise' on Tax Cuts
January 27, 2009

Republicans Take Tentative First Steps Towards Republicanism
Update: Read My Lips: No New Tax Cuts
Update: Obama the Hardcore Ideologue

Boehner has instructed the House Republican caucus to oppose the crap sandwich.

Allah agrees this is the right policy move, but questions if it's the right political move. After all, the economy probably (hopefully) will recover, without government intervention, by the 2010 midterms; and yet the media and Democrats will claim it's all due to the stimulus. Won't that be disastrous for the GOP?

I don't think so. The GOP is will offer the argument that they were, in fact, pro-stimulus, but they wanted to temporarily cut payroll taxes and so forth. This "stimulus" is, as Mike Pence says (and I said a while ago), nothing but a "wish-list of long-standing liberal spending priorities." Most members of the public like public spending when it's spent on them specifically; but they don't like such sending when it's spent on others. This Crap Sandwich obviously is being spent mostly on "others." Even if the economy recovers in 2010, I think the Democrats will have a difficult time claiming it was only due to their efforts, or that only their particular Crap Sandwich would have worked, or that their Crap Sandwich was best and no modifications were necessary.

Even if it's not all that difficult for them to claim that -- it wasn't terribly hard for Clinton to claim vindication on his budget/spending deal of the early nineties -- at some point Republicans do have to put some small amount of faith in 1) their ideas and 2) their ability to articulate them to the public. Simply abandoning principles in favor of me-tooism won't win elections, either.

Does "Stimulus" of Any Sort Even Work? Interesting piece (well, interesting for an economics piece) from a feller at the U. of Chicago School of Business.

Via a prof at the U. of Chicago's economics department [name withheld to protect the guilty], who calls it "brilliant." Frankly I got lost halfway through and need to read it again, but maybe you can follow it.

Great Post-Partisan Uniter Announces Unwillingness to Compromise: Read my lips: No New Tax Cuts.

Ten Things I Hate About Your Stimulus Plan: Solid reasons here.

Hardly have to go past Number One:

A 2005 study by Andrew Mountford and Harald Uhlig "analyzed three types of policy shocks: a deficit-financed spending increase, a balanced budget spending increase (financed with higher taxes) and a deficit-financed tax cut, in which revenues increase but government spending stays unchanged. We found that a deficit-spending shock stimulates the economy for the first 4 quarters but only weakly compared to that for a deficit-financed tax cut." In other words, FDR vs. Clinton vs. Reagan, Reagan wins.

But let's look at Number Four, too:

4) An initial CBO analysis found that a mere $26 billion out of $274 billion in infrastructure spending, just 7 percent, would be delivered into the economy by next fall. An update determined that just 64 percent of the stimulus would reach the economy by 2011.

Gee, if only there were some way to magically put money in people's hands immediately, without even the delay of identifying a payee and writing and sending a check.

But that's just dreaming. Why, to do that, we'd have to imagine that the government was taking huge amounts of people's wealth and could immediately inject a trillion dollars into the economy by merely taking less of it. With the stroke of a pen.

Obviously, that's "magical thinking." No such scenario exists in America today.

Just Considering... Think about what a hardcore ideologue Obama must be.

Usually Democrats oppose tax cuts on two grounds: 1) they just don't like them and 2) tax cuts mean, sometimes but not always, less revenue which means less government spending, and they are big in favor of more government spending.

Obviously reason 1 is an ideological response, and a kneejerk one at that.

Reason 2 is also ideological, but at least there is some reason given to oppose tax cuts. If you prioritize government spending above everything, then of course you prioritize it higher than tax cuts.

What is interesting in the current situation is that Obama does not have to choose between cutting taxes and increasing spending. Because we are told we are on the verge of a deflationary crisis, and need to get as much money into the economy as possible, deficits be damned, Obama is in a situation that no other Democrat has been in since FDR: He can pretty much do anything he likes, and blow up the deficit as much he dares, with public support.

That means that he could easily both spend a fair amount and also offer a lot of tax cuts to really stimulate the economy. Cut the payroll taxes temporarily: Stimulate consumption.. Cut the capital gains tax rates, even temporarily: Stimulate investment.

Any tax cuts he proposes do not have to come at the expense of new spending. We're already, apparently, on a pathway to historic, budget-busting spending no matter what we do. He could just ease off on some of this enormous spending to offer some useful tax cuts to immediately inject a huge quantity of money directly into the economy.

But he won't do it. He opposes real tax cuts (as opposed to the fake welfare "tax cuts" he claims are tax cuts, which is really just cutting checks for people who don't pay taxes and calling it a "tax credit") simply because he ideologically, reflexively does not like tax cuts.

Whoah, Missed a Major Point: Tax cuts are always popular. Always.

Obama ran on them (but won't deliver). Clinton ran on them (but won't deliver).

So Obama is giving up a chance to not only put real action behind his post-partisan posturing and to genuinely stimulate an ailing economy, but to also give his popularity numbers a big boost.

He's turning all that down.

Because he's precisely the rigid soft-Marxist ideologue we always thought.

Get Me Rewrite: The CBO put out a report that only a tiny fraction of the infrastructure spending would be spent before next fall -- just 7%. And not terribly much more over the following year.

Obviously this isn't what the Congress wanted to hear.

So, shocker of shockers, the Democrat controlled CBO has quickly put out a new report, and claims now that 65$ of the total spending of the "stimulus" will be out the door by 2010, and a significantly higher fraction of the infrastructure, too.

Wow. I'm so glad the Democrats don't politicize the agencies they control.

digg this
posted by Ace at 02:07 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
Smell the Glove: "@338 Jim ,Norm MacDonald "the #1 alternative band ..."

callsign claymore: "Hey Doof! ..."

TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini: "Those darn corporations! ..."

caroline ellison: "The ironic part? The link has pics of the guys inv ..."

Chicxulub : "297 More than a million acres in TX burning now. A ..."

Raul McHartney : "Reggae, Ska? Now do Skiffle. ..."

Joe Mannix (Not a cop!): "If they aren't retarded they will not choose door ..."

ShainS -- Laken Riley (Business is business, and it's a murder most foul) [/b][/i][/s][/u] : "OMG, are they really going with: 1. Venezuela rel ..."

Burnt Umber: "In regard to the previous post, everyone should ha ..."

whig: "Except Shiff's brain is smaller. Posted by: jim ( ..."

Planned Parenthood: "[i[303 Killing babies is a cultural thing in some ..."

jim (in Kalifornia) [/b] [/s] [/i] [/u]: "322 This motherfucker has been a busy beaver. I ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64