Sponsored Content

Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Michael Jordan vs. CEO John Roberts Rogers | Main | American Academy of Diplomacy President skeptical about Obama's upcoming ambassadorial appointments
November 13, 2008

David Brooks Writes Another Useless, Gassy Column

Which John Hawkins debunks.

I object to this column on a lot of levels. For one thing, it's a typical lazy effort, setting up a "Reformist vs. Traditionalist" fight without actually providing much by way of detail as to what policies Brooks wants to pursue.

I have an idea, actually.

But why be coy about it, David? Why not just advocate for the positions you favor, rather than vaguely alluding to the idea that change is needed? What change?

You want the party to be more liberal. We get that. How about writing columns about the actual issues and actual positions you favor rather than forever nattering on about the hazy idea of "change" you can never quite rouse the courage -- or effort -- to detail?

There's a dishonest aspect to this, too. Brooks -- and Sager, and etc. -- often avoid advocating substantively, on policy grounds, for their positions, instead preferring to argue in the neutral-sounding way that "We must do this to win." And yet the polling data often does not even seem to support that position (nor do they offer much except naked assertion that adopting liberal policies will lead to electoral success).

I point out again that in liberal California, Prop 8 won by 53-47. You can argue that this is an immoral and retrograde policy -- and please do, if that is what you believe. But do that, and have the courage to actually advocate for the positions you favor, rather than this endless pretense that you're not really discussing the issue on the merits but only on the horserace political strategy level.

They're really not arguing for a change in Republican strategy or policy. They're arguing for a change in the Republican voting population itself -- they want Republicans to change their opinions in favor of the minority, liberal-leaning Northeastern establishment opinion. Fine -- that is their right. So start honestly and openly attempting to change Republican minds, rather than pushing nonsense like "pro-gay marriage policy is a net electoral winner."

An interesting take on this from NRO, arguing, persuasively, that there really is no such thing as a "centrist program" in the first place, and there's little to be gained by pursuing a phantasm.

Incidentally, a while ago I suggested that people really shouldn't be reading David Brooks. Some commenters disagreed, stating that it's important to read differing positions within the movement.

My suggestion really wasn't a call for a boycott per se. Rather, it was animated by the fact that David Brooks is the Rockefeller Republican version of David Broder. He never really says anything particularly interesting, but is for reasons unfathomable considered something of a Gray Eminence dispensing wisdom.

I find him useless. I honestly never find any of his columns interesting, provocative, or persuasive. They seem to be, like Jerry Seinfeld were he a pundit, Columns About Nothing.

Well, almost nothing. I know he wants the Republican Party to become more liberal. Liberal in what way? To what extent? I don't know, and I hardly consider him such an intellectual heavyweight that I will parse his words, trying to divine his hidden meanings. as if he's the Fed Chairman hinting about a future overnight lending rate rise.

I realize he's a hack on a deadline and has to produce two columns a week. I realize that writing about nothing is a necessary skill for anyone expected to write consistently. (I do it a little -- not enough, as it turns out. Witness the past week. I've got nothing much to write and I've spent most of the week not writing it.)

But an excessively large fraction of Brooks' columns seem to belong to the category of "I Got Nothin' But a Deadline So Here Comes Some Bullshit." One third, maybe. Even one half would be excusable.

But 90%? No, that's too high, feller.

digg this
posted by Ace at 10:56 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
Divide by Zero [/i]: " Bathroom remodels: ka-ching, ka-ching Kitchen r ..."

JQ: "Bers, oh that is heartbreaking! Mom wanted to ..."

Berserker-Dragonheads Division : " After she died the light just went out in my fath ..."

JQ: "Dad outlived Mom by almost 18 years. He eventually ..."

jim (in Kalifornia): "Well, up way too late. Night all. ..."

SFGoth: "Oh, it was for coolest-looking car. Silver with f ..."

JQ: "After she died the light just went out in my fathe ..."

SFGoth: "3rd grade pinewood derby competition, i voted for ..."

Berserker-Dragonheads Division : "Christmas was Mom's favorite holiday... She always ..."

JQ: "I'm sure things are a bit different, for those who ..."

acid techno: "Discover the best techno track of 2023, n°1 D ..."

JQ: "Once, on a trip across the southern border, I trie ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64