Sponsored Content

Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

« Our Long National Nightmare Is Over: Sarah Palin's Personal Physician Releases a Summary of Her Health Records | Main | Columbia U.'s Reply to Request They Themselves Release Khalidi Tape: "Yeah, Right... Loser" »
November 04, 2008

Five Reasons Obama Lost

I'm not living in that past tense yet, but I do love their reasons. I'll call it "five reasons Obama oughta lose".

One nit.

There are many Republicans who still remember Democrats stealing the 1960 election with voter fraud in Chicago and Mayor Daley’s expert campaigning in cemeteries to deliver the zombie vote for Kennedy.

Hey! I remember reading about it.

All seriousness aside, I don't think it's all that well known. 2000 and 2004 nonsense fresh enough though.

Good read. Hope they're right.

tip: Nice Deb

Their map projection..


More [ace]: This 1980 article from Time is worth a read -- a "What Happened?" on pollsters calling the Reagan-Carter race "too close to call" up to the day of voting, only to see Reagan win a ten point blow out.

It could be a bit like the current situation -- but in reverse. Perhaps people aren't as confident in the radical socialist Obama as the pollsters think, just as they were never apparently as apprehensive about Reagan as pollsters thought.

Looking for explanations of what went wrong, Wirthlin believes that the other pollsters erred by estimating that there would be more Democrats in the final body of voters than there turned out to be.

What a shock.

Here are the pollsters responding to the one pollster who got it closer to right. This occurs in the context of a debate -- did pollsters have it wrong all along, or did they have it right, but Reagan suddenly got a ten point lead in the 48 hours before the election they didn't poll?

Mitofsky and other pollsters sought to "prove" the latter -- the didn't want to admit they were simply wrong all along. Here is he responding to one pollster who got it closer to right


Mitofsky disagrees strenuously with the criticisms. Says he: "I can't buy their approach to making estimates from data. I'm not prepared to throw out our techniques just because one poll produced a different number. In fact, if we were doing this all again, I would not change a single thing except to poll the last two days of the campaign. To believe their figures, too many other people have to be wrong."

Kinda says it all. Mitofsky wouldn't change anything... because hey, they couldn't all have been wrong, could they?

More: Growing Optimism? So it is claimed.

digg this
posted by Dave In Texas at 12:04 AM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
jim (in Kalifornia): "13 The FBI just got a brand new building. I don't ..."

CWrayzie[/i][/i][/i][/b][/b][/b][/s][/s][/s][/u][/u][/u]: "Some of our Christmas and Easter Catholics oppress ..."

GOP Caucus: "The Criminal Christopher Wray Asks Congress to Ren ..."

FeatherBlade: ""Wray testified that stripping the FBI of its 702 ..."

Blake - semi lurker at large: "The FBI just got a brand new building. I don't car ..."

Xipe Totec: "I repeat; Dissolve the alphabet agencies. Too corr ..."

jim (in Kalifornia): "[i]So how many people were fired for targeting Cat ..."

fd: ""We have to be very careful about what we can say, ..."

Axeman: "Yeah, that a reading the post cost me #1. Congrats ..."

Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars (TM) [/b][/i][/s][/u]: " This is easy, GOP: a firm and unanimous "NO". ..."

It's me donna : "I like Daniels ..."

AnonyBotymousDrivel Remembers Babbitt and Perna: "[i]"It makes perfect sense that liberal Democrat b ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64