Bill Clinton: You Know, We Could Maybe Wind Up Turning a Profit on This | Main | House Panel Finds Democrats Cheated On Vote To Prevent Illegal Immigrants From Getting Food Stamps And Other Welfare Benefits.
September 25, 2008


Just because this seems to be the core point upon which we disagree:

In, short, given enough time, markets will sort this out, at far less expense to us all.

I know precious little about economics and still less about South American economics, but I do know this: The history of South America is nothing but big booms (during which South American countries grow more rapidly than any mature economy) followed by profound busts -- depressions, basically.

(At least until the modern era, anyway. Based on past performance, I'm skeptical that South America is finally on some sort of healthy economic trajectory, but I suppose there's always the hope that this time the boom and bust cycle is over.)

Is it really true that the "markets sort out depressions and panics" more efficiently than would be had by Big Footing Government Intervention?

Is it really true that it's rational (and healthy) to have six or eight years of 10% growth followed by four or six years of severe economic contraction of 10% and unemployment reaching, who knows (I don't), 30%?

I don't believe that. I believe the boom-times are irrational and "artificial," in the sense that they're not based on any reasonable estimation of future economic growth, and the massive busts are even more irrational and artificial.

They are "natural," however, in the sense that that's how people behave, and will keep on behaving, forever, until the end of time.

And even if that's "natural" (which I concede it is), I cannot concede it's healthy or desirable. Nor can I concede this represents the best, most efficient growth trajectory possible. I do not believe that South American economies are healthier for the fact they essentially start out again from zero, almost as if they're rebuilding after a Road Warrior scale apocalypse, every fifteen years.

Anyway, on to my hypothetical: If an intervention were proposed in 1929 which would have had a (let us say) 50% chance of stabilizing the markets and ending the panic, and turning a grueling depression into a three year recession, would the US government have been justified in doing so?

I realize that many do not want to concede the premises of the hypothetical and will say that interventions can't work. I would direct their attention to the Mexican bailout, where a big foot investor (the US government) did in fact arrest the panic and get the markets functioning again. So even if you resist the notion this works, well, you have to at least concede it has worked on occasion, and in the near past.

Is it our Constitutional right to suffer the miseries caused by utterly irrational panics and market dysfunctions?

I don't know how precious that right is to me.

It is decidedly true that markets -- when functional and rational -- sort these things out better than any government every could.

When they're functional and rational. Key words. We know they often aren't. Once every five, ten, fifteen years... they're not. That's a historic and economic fact which doctrine cannot challenge.

So, yes, functional markets filled with rational actors will sort these things out better than the government.

I do not believe that rule applies when they are dysfunctional or irrational.

digg this
posted by Ace at 03:17 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
MkY: "Goin' mobile. Posted by: ZOD You and those othe ..."

Draki: "Prepping is a beautiful thing ..."

ZOD: ">>409 Suburbia is not particularly defensible. Nor ..."

rickb223 [/s][/b][/i][/u]: " I just realized that we don't have NEARLY enough ..."

All Hail Eris, Live! from the Dungeon of Discord: "Thanks for this thread, CBD et al. By coincidence ..."

MkY: "This is all good mental exercise. Honestly. Lots ..."

Ian Deal: "Think probably scenarios based on where you live. ..."

confederatefifth: "Suburbia is not particularly defensible. Nor are r ..."

Diogenes: "Anybody have candles? We always have candles arou ..."

Common Tater: "If you've experience in camping, particularly exte ..."

Notsothoreau - look forward: "The ICO candle lanterns are nice. You can buy mold ..."

Pete Seria: "The Little House on the Prairie books are good ins ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64