Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

« Kosovo Sniper Alert: Barack Obama Takes Credit for Vet Bill He Didn't Contribute to and In Fact Didn't Even Vote On | Main | Gaffe Of The Day...This Time By McCain Adviser Charlie Black »
June 23, 2008

Tasty Rumor/Speculation: Scalia Writing the Majority Opinion on DC Guns Case

I am having difficulty comprehending how the meager facts here point to such a conclusion, but hell, I'll play.

It does look exceptionally likely that Justice Scalia is writing the principal opinion for the Court in Heller – the D.C. guns case. That is the only opinion remaining from the sitting and he is the only member of the Court not to have written a majority opinion from the sitting.

So? If he's in the minority, he doesn't get to write a majority opinion, even if his considerable talents have been underutilized by the liberal Kennedy Court (let's call it what it is) thusfar.

Allah asks:

Why would Roberts, who’s presumably in the majority here, assign an opinion this momentous to Scalia instead of to himself? Is it just an act of deference on his part to a justice who may care more about this issue than he does? Is he trying to leverage Scalia’s rhetorical skills, knowing that this is going to be pored over like few other opinions in the last 10 years?

It's routine for the chief justice to assign opinions to other judges. It doesn't mean anything, necessarily, thought it might mean a little. That alte kacher Stevens was in the majority for the Boumediene decision, and, as senior justice in the majority, had the prerogative of assigning the opinion to anyone in the majority, including himself. He chose Kennedy, which doesn't really mean much. Tactically, I guess, he assigned it to the closest thing to a conservative so that liberals could (as they like to) say, "Even conservative Justice Kennedy agrees, and he wrote the opinion!" Which is like saying "Even conservative Andrew Sullivan wants to have Barack Obama's babies."

Roberts is supposed to spread the work around, and also assign cases to the justice he thinks would do the best job at the opinion. I don't think there's much question that Scalia is among the most talented, trenchant, and logical of opinion-writers. If there's a particular reason for assigning it to Scalia, it's because you know the sort of opinion Scalia's going to write: Punchy, direct, and forceful. Scalia is also a past-master at his own theory of jurisprudence -- which involves deciphering, based on history, not just what the words of the Constitution may mean but what they did commonly mean back in 1789-ish, which is the whole shebang of this particular decision.

When you want an opinion explaining how "contemporaneous norms" of jursiprudence, shaped by the authority of European courts and our "evolving" conceptions of the fairness and equality, actually explain what Americans meant when drafting their Constitution back in the eighteenth century, you assign an opinion to Anthony Kennedy. When you want an opinion to explore what people actually intended and believed they were writing in the eighteenth century, you assign an opinion to Scalia.

An unrelated anecdote: Chief Justice Warren Burger frequently found himself in the minority in the liberal-dominated Brennan/Marshall court. So he often changed his vote to vote with the liberal majority, and then, having now grabbed the prerogative of assigning the opinion writing to any judge, assigned the opinion to himself. And then, while technically holding as the majority wished, both in terms of opinion and actual result, he attempted through his writing to minimize the decision to the extent possible so that it was more limited than the liberal majority desired. He also stuck in word choices designed to undermine the whole opinion.

That tactic didn't always work, because the liberals would group together to form a majority concurrence of five or more justices which would basically say, "We go far beyond what is announced in the supposedly-controlling main opinion, and since we have five votes for this expansive liberal opinion, this shit right here is the real majority opinion; ignore that other one."

Still, he tried.

Idiot liberal law clerks were fond of asking "Is Burger stupid or evil?" Which is a great compliment coming from such soft-headed dweebs.

Correction: I started this post off by saying I didn't think Roberts' assignment of the opinion to Scalia meant much at all (assuming he's so assigned it). In the process of writing I figured out, Hey, it actually does mean something, probably.

digg this
posted by Ace at 04:23 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
Alteria Pilgram: "Patsy Cline - Walkin' After Midnight 1957 https:/ ..."

Skip: "G'Day everyone Though yesterday was Tuesday so I ..."

JQ: "nood ..."

Miklos, because a boy can dream: "Nope. No lottery win for me... Posted by: JQ ..."

Biden's Dog sniffs a whole lotta malarkey, : "DANG! Pixy beat me to it! ..."

JQ: "New car Caviar 4-star Baby, think I'll buy me a ..."

Biden's Dog sniffs a whole lotta malarkey, : "BOING! Pixy's tech thread? I've got a submissio ..."

Farmer, with my own historical take: "Patsy Cline - Walkin' After Midnight 1957 https:/ ..."

Miklos , cuuerntly attired in a signrd Rush T-shirt with a flag and all: "Obama's half-brother George, Home Sweet Hut at Jul ..."

JQ: "Money! Get back I'm all right, Jack Keep your h ..."

Alteria Pilgram: "Patsy Cline - Walkin' After Midnight 1957 https ..."

Puddleglum at work: "I'm sure your kittuh's will appreciate a valued st ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64