« That Tasered Dude |
Main
|
Van Halen Pre-Tour Rehearsals »
September 18, 2007
Is it still pro-bono if you're seeking legal fees?
The Seattle Times asks the question. I'm thinking that the public's notion of pro-bono differs considerably from that of these lawyers.
Lawyers at Davis Wright Tremaine didn't charge a parent group for seven years of work on a U.S. Supreme Court case against Seattle Public Schools: They took the case pro bono.
But now that the firm is trying to collect $1.8 million in legal fees from the school district, several national legal experts say the term technically, "pro bono publico," meaning "for the public good" may no longer apply.
The firm's effort has put a local lens on a national debate: If attorneys get paid for pro bono work, is it still pro bono?