Sponsored Content

Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

ę Two More Rules And Then To Bed | Main | How Could You Go Wrong...(Jake) Ľ
August 04, 2007

History Lesson: A Reminder About Air Travel [Gabriel Malor]

I travel by air so often it feels like the norm to me, but I have just been reminded that itís only been a year since the foiling of the UK-US airline terror plot which resulted in restrictions on passengers with liquids in their carry-on luggage. After deciding that a threat was posed by unmonitored liquids in flight, the TSA banned liquids, aerosols, and gels on flights into and out of the country.

Is the liquid ban really necessary? Has the TSA or others actually studied whether a liquid bomb constitutes a threat? Have we just become habituated to the whole thing?

The TSA last adjusted the ban on September 26, 2006, deciding that:

Travelers may now carry through security checkpoints travel-size toiletries (3 ounces or less) that fit comfortably in ONE, QUART-SIZE, clear plastic, zip-top bag.
After clearing security, travelers can now bring beverages and other items purchased in the secure boarding area on-board aircraft.

Itís about time, I think, to question whether these restrictions are necessary. Right from the outset, we should recognize two things when setting air travel security policy: (1) airplanes are for a variety of reasons likely targets for terrorism; and (2) there is some acceptable level of risk of a terrorist incident onboard one.

At the time of the final ban announcement, just a month and a half after the plot was made public, the TSA assured the flying public that it had made a thorough study of the danger:

Please keep in mind that these rules were developed after extensive research and understanding of current threats.

I donít suppose anyone has seen this ďextensive research.Ē Iím curious to know just what threat the TSA has identified. I see only two options: (1) mixing of chemicals mid-flight to create a bomb; and (2) carrying on already-mixed liquid explosives.

The first possibility has been widely criticized as not only implausible, but so improbable as to be no credible threat. Even ignoring the difficulties in actually mixing the compounds in such a way as to produce explosives without asphyxiating oneself or creating a messy but non-threatening stain in the lavatory, the first possibility requires good conditions and time in which to work, time in which the passengers and crew would almost certainly become aware of unusual activity in the lavatory.

The second has me a bit more worried, because I can see how it would be possible to simply carry already-mixed explosives in a soda bottle through the security checkpoint. But is it any more difficult to put some already-mixed explosives in any of the numerous items that can currently be carried onto an airplane? How is it an acceptable level of risk to allow all manner of consumer electronics onto airplanes, all of which contain compartments suitable for covertly storing liquids, but an unacceptable risk to allow bottles of soda?

Finally, as clichť as it now is to suggest, I cannot help but think that the liquid ban simply endures because we would like to think that it makes us safer. Of course, itís also easier to maintain the status quo than reevaluate the situation. But I think itís about time, one year after the situation first came to our attention, to take a look at the liquids ban and decide if it is really necessary.

digg this
posted by xgenghisx at 04:04 AM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
browndog Official Mascot of Team Gizzard: "I had The Golf Channel on earlier this afternoon f ..."

Admirale's Mate: "2nd ..."

Grumpy and Recalcitrant: "I summoned 'em. ..."

Admirale's Mate: "first ..."

Grumpy and Recalcitrant: "NOOD Last Cafe of the week is up. ..."

Miklos is no longer a Boy Scout: "I would have thought one look at you and she would ..."

Le Mikleuse: "too bad for them that English is the lingua Franca ..."

jim (in Kalifornia): "85 I just want to say I successfully whined up som ..."

tcn in AK, hail to the thief: "I have one of those seat belt cutter emergency too ..."

jim (in Kalifornia): "83 The French are super uptight about their langua ..."

jim (in Kalifornia): "[i]The fart heard around the world. John Kerry let ..."

Hard Boiled Miklos: "Now all the Detective Novels are gonna need some n ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64