Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

« That Whole Pace Hate-Crime Dealio | Main | Gregalogue About The "Pat Tillman Political Assassination" Tonight
Maybe No Show Tonight Anyway, Due To Minneapolis Bridge Collapse »
August 01, 2007

Jaws Trailer, Recut
Plus, Andrew Sullivan Endorses Theory That Roberts' Seizure Was Due To Drug Overdose!

It is not the six billionth Brokeback Mountain parody, so don't stop watching it just because you think you figured it out. It parodies a movie that's even gayer than Brokeback. Overlong, as usual, but worth the payoff.

Now, it is blog etiquette to link the blog one got something from. However, in this case, I'm conflicted. Andrew Sullivan criticizes Instapundit thirty six times a day for "giving an approving link" to conservative blogs he doesn't approve of, claiming that doing so constitutes tacit endorsement of everything said in that post and, sometimes, everything ever said on that blog.

So given I got this link from someone who peddles insane conspiracy theories, how can I in good faith give the old "approving link" to this blog?

Well, I can't. It would compromise my integrity too much.

Incidentally, if Mr. Approving Link Critic is so critical of the approving link, what the hell is this demented nincompoop doing linking a blog claiming that Chief Justice Roberts suffered epilepsy due to illicit drug use?

The moron-blog to which this cockring links:

How Do We Know Justice Roberts is Not On Drugs?

So, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts had a “seizure” yesterday. It wasn’t the first time, you know.

According to the New York Daily News, this kind of “seizure” has happened to John Roberts at least one time before. They report that John Roberts also fell down and lost consciousness while playing golf back in 1993.

This time, he was on a dock in at his vacation home in Port Clyde, Maine. I know Port Clyde. It’s not exactly a bustling metropolis. It’s a sleepy little town by the ocean, with bed and breakfasts and rental cottages. It’s the kind of place that people like John Roberts go to in order to relax.

So, I doubt the suggestion in the Daily News article that these seizures could be brought on by stress. The kind of stress that is required to bring on seizures is pretty rare in places like out on the golf course or on a boat dock at a vacation home. If John Roberts really is having stress-induced seizures that lead him to lose consciousness and fall down while playing golf and walking out on the dock at his oceanside vacation home, then he’s a maniac.

There is something other than stress that can induce “seizures” that make people fall down and lose consciousness: Psychoactive drugs. Remember when Britney Spears all of a sudden lost consciousness and had to be carried out of her birthday party? It wasn’t stress that caused that incident.

How do we know that Justice John Roberts isn’t losing consciousness because he’s on some kind of drug obtained by prescription or on the street?

If John Roberts is taking psychoactive drugs, he wouldn’t be the first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court to do so. His predecessor, Chief Justice William Rehnquist, was hooked on the psychoactive drug Placidyl for years while serving as Chief Justice, and was often under the influence of the drug while hearing arguments in legal cases before the Court.

As to this theory: Um, epileptics are prone to seizures. Many things can cause seizures in all people; epileptics' brains are simply very, very bad about resisting such seizure-inducing situations.

Here's one thing that can give someone a seizure: Failing to get at least 5 hours of good sleep. I know that because whenever I don't get that much sleep I get -- get this -- seizures.

Add a bit of stress to that and I'm dancing on my back.

A raft of other things can cause a seizure, including dehydration or too much sunlight. Add stress to that, bang.

So, um, this, uh, Brain Surgeon seems to have been absent the day they taught neuroscience at Brain Surgeon school.

But I do enjoy how authoritatively he dismisses the idiopathic seizure disorder diagnosis Roberts' doctors decided upon. Oh, he knows better. Far better.

As to Sullivan: Sullivan will claim this wasn't an "approving link" because he called the theory "wild-eyed." Is that the trick, then? Continue the practice of pushing every conceivable smear and conspiracy out there, just throw the words "wild eyed" into the link?

"Just airing" some theories again, Sullivan?

I suggest that Instapundit simply throw in the words "wild-eyed" whenever he links one of these awful insane hateful conservative blogs. That apparently covers you when you're spreading, as usual, deranged, reckless, and utterly unsubstantiated conspiracy theories and smears.

PS: Sullivan also claimed that despite his constant slamming of Instapundit for his "approving links," he was under no obligation whatsoever to correct the record when much of the left blogosphere cited he himself for the proposition that Fred Thompson was a closeted gay man.

So his "colorful and far-ranging sex life" smear was, ahem, "misinterpreted" by the left as meaning Fred Thompson was gay, and Sullivan admitted (after being asked about this point repeatedly) that he knew he was being linked and "misinterpreted" so, but he had no obligation at all to contradict those using his own post to advance that smear.

Approving links, indeed.

Stay classy, Atlantic Monthly. A Chief Justice is stricken by epilepsy and one of your four very classy bloggers is linking smears that he's had an overdose-induced seizure.

For those who care, the actual emails below.

You continue to avoid specific questions. Are you actually claiming you were unaware Wonkette had linked you and "misinterpreted" your insinuation?

Are you actually claiming that no one wrote you an email along the lines of, "Fred Thompson gay?!! Really?! SPILL!"

I do not believe that for one red hot moment, Andrew. The fact that you won't even bother asserting such absurdities as true tends suggest you're not even comfortable lying hard enough to do so.

So you...

1) Just happened to insinuate a gay rumor popular among the gay and the left, who no doubt send you a lot of tips.

2) Just happened to resort to strangely suggestive language -- "colorful" (as in gaily plumed? Christ, colorful was code for gay before "flamboyant"), "far-ranging" (is heterosexual sex that "far-ranging" for a heterosexual?), and suggested that the GOP voters' tolerance for "sexual minorities" would be a boon for Fred Thompson.

2) a) If you only meant he had a lot of sex with women, why didn't you simply say something like "an extensive sexual history" or a "prodigious sexual history," suggesting a lot of sex? Instead, you said "colorful" and "far-ranging," suggesting not just a lot of numbers, but a lot of *variety* wink, wink.

3) And then, when it was quite clear to you that the left/gay left was taking this as an insinuated outing, you did nothing -- NOTHING-- to correct the record for two weeks until I specifically called you on it.


This is what you're selling?

Incidentally, you claim you "don't out people's sexual privacy," but even by your own claims, you're telling me you meant to let everyone know that Fred Thompson had a lot of heterosexual sex (of the "colorful, far-ranging" variety, one assumes) which we'll all soon know about. [Note: He claimed here he was talking about what a "woman from Tennessee" told him about Fred's sexual exploits, which were not "necessarily" about homoexual sex. So even by his own claims-- he was, in fact, outing someone's private sexual behavior.]

So you're just saying you WILL out someone's private sexual life - at least you'll insinuate about it, promising more details to come from other sources -- you just wouldn't be so ungallant as to out someone as gay.

Another email by me:

And what does "as we'll soon find out" mean, praytell? We already know he banged a bunch of chicks. So please tell me what additional information about his "colorful and far-ranging sexual history" you believe we'll soon be privvy too.

You resorted to the sort of euphemism used by gossip columns when they want to say someone's gay but don't want to risk libel (hey, why not just call him "flamboyant' as well?), you trafficked in a rumor popular on the gay left, it's been two weeks since you said this and you KNEW how it had been "translated" by Wonkette and many, many others but did not "correct" their "misinterpretation"...

Me, again:

Please. It's just a coincidence, I guess, that people have been pushing this rumor since March, and you claim Fred Thompson may benefit from GOP voter's tolerance regarding "sexual minorities"?

You came up with the words "colorful and far-ranging sexual history" to describe a guy *who merely dated a bunch of women*? Have you ever described Bob Kerrey as having a "colorful and far-ranging sexual history"?

Anyway, after this sort of badgering by me (and his general denials which never actually addressed the specific questions I was asking, mixed in with calling me a gay-hater, of course), he finally addressed the question I'd put to him three or four times:

look, i have a lot on my plate and i don't follow all the trackbacks, no.

but a reader emailed me and told me about the wonkette thing. i was surprised. but i didn't think it was worth rebutting a point i didn't even make.

people write all sorts of things about my posts and i can't keep up with them.

He concludes with a flourish, urging me to "leave this viciousness behind."

So, there you go. Instapundit is responsible for the content of every word of post or blog he links, but Andrew Sullivan didn't "think it was worth rebutting" the wide understanding that he was insinuating he had secret knowledge that Fred Thompson's sexual tastes ran towards the... well, towards the JimBimbo side of the dugout, I guess.

digg this
posted by Ace at 06:56 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
davidt: "There was a story Crooks was with a small group be ..."

[/i][/b][/s][/u]I used to have a different nic: "[i]Boy, that stray little "Chinese national" spark ..."

Don Black: "They know who brought the cocaine into the WH ..."

Captain Obvious, Laird o' the Sea, Radioactive Knight: " I've never cared for Earl Grey; I don't like the ..."

Moron Robbie - if you can't pick your adjectives, how can you pick your pronouns? : "and the first time he visited the location where h ..."

[/i] [/s] [/u] [/b]An Observation sez China Joe not my president: "Now does everyone understand why the Secret Servic ..."

Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing: "[i]Tea. Earl Grey. Hot. Posted by: Captain Obviou ..."

Biden's Dog sniffs a whole lotta malarkey, : "Libs of TikTok shoots down another teacher in Okla ..."

Divide by Zero [/i]: " Wiki has a couple of pages devoted to locations ..."

Anna Puma: "The Iran threat is a red herring to distract the g ..."

Moron Robbie - if you can't pick your adjectives, how can you pick your pronouns? : "How good and pleasant it is when God’s peopl ..."

[/i][/b][/s][/u]I used to have a different nic: "[i]They probably unlocked the fucking roof hatch f ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64