Sponsored Content




Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

NoVaMoMe 2024: 06/08/2024
Arlington, VA
Details to follow


Texas MoMe 2024: 10/18/2024-10/19/2024 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« "Death Knell" For HD-DVD Format? Blockbuster Puts Blu-Ray Into 1700 Stores | Main | Ridley Scott Will Use All His Talent And Craft To Make... Movie Based on the Board Game Monopoly »
June 18, 2007

Rejoinder To "Sicko's" Boosterism of Candadian Health Care System

So I'm told. I haven't watched it yet.

I stopped watching Sicko after it went into Michael Moore's comfort zone of conspiracy theories and Republican-bashing. The early parts about health insurance companies aggressively looking for any pretext to deny coverage they were, in fact, lawfully contracted to provide were effective, I thought. Seems to me that if you are lucky enough to have health insurance, and to be paying for that service out of your own pocket (and if your employer pays, it's still your pocket-- that's part of your salary), you have the right to expect them to actually give you full value on your premiums, as Paul Anka would say.

In an effort to reduce costs, they seem to arbitrarily deny coverage to whomever they can. That's wrong -- if paying the true costs of covering everyone they've contracted to cover would require raising rates, then they should actually raise rates, rather than simply look for random people whose coverage they can deny. While I'm sure that Moore's evidence is highly selective and also anecdotal, it can't be denied he had on one former health industry worker explaining that whenever an insured actually required costly treatment the insurer had contracted to pay, a "hit team" went after his application looking for any plausible, or even implausible reason, to claim fraud in the application process and thereby deny all coverage.

Many Americans don't have health coverage. They know they're not covered. That's bad, but at least they know what they can expect (i.e., nothing).

On the other hand, many Americans do have health coverage. They know they're covered... except they're not, not quite. They're covered if and only if the insurer cannot contrive some reason to deny them coverage when they actually need it.

Whether Moore's evidence here is no longer operative, I don't know. Has the health insurance "bill of rights" corrected these wrongs? Again, I don't know. But denying a woman continuing coverage because she failed to disclose she'd once had a yeast infection -- a yeast infection! -- is pretty egregious.

Previews of more anti-socialist medicine short films can be seen here. They'll be released in full next week.


A Right Wing Blogger Confirms The Gist Of Insurers' Determination To Deny Insurance To The Insured: Robbie from the Malcontent:

I work with insurance, and I found the scenes involving the American insurance industry to be convincing and factual. Sure, Moore is going to find the most egregious and infuriating examples of what insurance companies can (and will) do to save themselves money. But the gist of it is true: You may think you have insurance, but if you make even the slightest and most innocent of mistakes on insurance applications, the company can and will pull that coverage if they're in the mood. (And they're almost always in the mood to find ways out of six and seven figure claims).

On the other hand, he finds Moore -- get this! -- to be either childishly naive and/or deliberate mendacious as regards socialized medicine:

However, Moore lost me when he decided to go on his "The rest of the world is a health care wonderland!" jaunt. I've lived in Britain. I have stories about Britain. Among them, all of the private dentists in the area I lived had years-long waiting lists. That doesn't exactly speak well of the kind of treatment people receive within the NHS. Of the people I knew in England who could afford regular private medical treatment, almost every single one of them opted for it.

Brown Line contradicts Moore's claim that there are no long queues for treatment in Canada:

As for the Canadian health system, both my wife and I have lived in Canada; and among my friends are Canadian physicians. Just try getting a doctor, even in a major metropolitan area like Toronto: good luck. Single-payer plans are not immune to controlling costs by restricting access; in fact, that's their principal means of doing so. They don't forbid you from having anything you need; they just make the queue unreasonably long. And given that there's no competition, users have no recourse when they're screwed.

If you like to discuss public policy based on what you see in the movies, I strongly suggest viewing the opening ten minutes of the Canadian film The Barbarian Invasions, which walks the viewer through a (fictional) oncology ward in a Montreal hospital. Consider, too, the scenes where palms have to be greased to get what we would consider an acceptable level of care, or in which a patient has to be taken across the border into the US, at his own expense, to receive diagnostic radiologic procedures in a reasonable amount of time, ie, while he's still alive.

There are plenty of problems with our health-care system. But Canadian-style socialism would only make matters worse.

I accept this all as true. What I found compelling -- and infuriating, even as a heartless rightwinger -- is that companies with whom you had contracted, and paid!, to deliver a service were/are constantly trying to weasel out of their end of the bargain on the shoddiest of pretexts.

Left-wing bleeding heartism aside, that's a basic violation of right-wing rule of law-ism.

I think some readers think that because I think Moore has successfully illustrated a problem, that means, ipso facto, I've bought into his "solution."

Not so. As I said, if insurance companies cannot provide the catastrophic coverage they've contracted to provide, they should either stop offering it (and stop taking premiums for it) or else raise rates to more accurately reflect the cost of actually providing the service. I find denial-due-to-sham-pretext system repulsive on numerous grounds. Even if it "keeps costs down," it's doing so in the worst way possible -- not by generally reducing benefits on all (increasing copays, etc.) but by striking like lighting out of the blue to deny this person and that person coverage completely based upon a meaningless failure to disclose something as innocuous as a yeast infection.


digg this
posted by Ace at 03:40 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
Alberta Oil Peon: "Well, off to the snoozer for me. Night, Horde. ..."

Alberta Oil Peon: "King Biscuit Boy with Crowbar. Had beers with Bisc ..."

Doo-Dah, Doo-Dah: "Regarding the lack of prosecution: Isn't the corr ..."

Ciampino - Update #171: "Brooklyn woman has jaw wired shut after stranger s ..."

Ciampino - Update #170: "Army suffers two Apache helicopter crashes within ..."

m: "499 ..."

m: "498 ..."

Ciampino - Update #169: "470 They say that the drummer and his Dad's reuni ..."

Ciampino - the cost of a new engine will buy a lot of fags: "459 I doubt an ordinary camera-equipped drone cou ..."

Alberta Oil Peon: "Little Feat, "Waiting For Columbus" is a darned go ..."

Stress Management Techniques for Women: "First off I want to say excellent blog! I had a qu ..."

SunyD: "The Who were never high on my playlists. None of ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64