Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups






















« You Will Believe A Dog Can Fly | Main | Litvinenko Investigation Turns To Identifying The Reactor Where Polonium Poison Was Produced »
December 15, 2006

Bush Leaning Towards 15,000 To 30,000 Fresh Troops In Iraq

A "surge" of firepower. It's about time.

Had he done this before the elections, the Republicans might have kept power, and who knows, Baghdad might already be nearly stabilized.

The Bush administration is leaning toward temporarily sending as many as 20,000 additional U.S. troops to Iraq, even as the Democrats taking charge of Congress demand a drawdown of forces.

U.S. officials say the increase is needed to make a new push to stabilize Baghdad and to bolster efforts to train the Iraqi army. The emerging plan is facing opposition from Iraqi officials adamant that more U.S. forces aren't the answer. U.S. military commanders in Baghdad have drawn up plans for the country that don't require any new personnel. The debate over whether to send additional U.S. forces to Iraq is the most visible manifestation of the high-level tumult roiling the Bush administration as it works to find a way forward there ahead of a presidential address to the nation early next year.

Although White House officials stress that no final decisions have been made, several aides involved in the internal deliberations say President Bush and senior administration officials appear receptive to calls to temporarily send 15,000 to 30,000 new U.S. forces to Iraq to bolster the 140,000 troops there.

...

Pentagon officials said they would send additional U.S. forces to Iraq only if the personnel had a clear military mission. "We would not surge without a purpose," the Army's top general, Peter J. Schoomaker, told reporters yesterday. "And that purpose should be measurable."

...

Deploying more U.S. forces to Iraq would be deeply unpopular in the U.S., where polls show that an increasing majority believes the U.S. is losing in Iraq, disapproves of the administration's handling of the war and wants to see a fixed timetable for a military withdrawal.

A bit of fact-free agendizing from the liberal WSJ reporters. Where is the poll stating that more troops, on a temporary basis, would be unpopular?

Rewrite: Deploying more U.S. forces to Iraq would be deeply unpopular in U.S. newsrooms.

A Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll this week found that declining public support for the war had brought Mr. Bush's overall approval ratings down to 34%, the lowest recorded to date in his presidency. The poll showed 35% of those surveyed favor a phased troop withdrawal "beginning immediately," up from 27% in July.

35% is a majority, you see.


digg this
posted by Ace at 05:31 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
[/i][/i][/b][/b]Christopher R Taylor[/i][/i][/b][/b]: "[i]Go. Here. Now. https://www.whitehouse.gov/[/ ..."

exdem13 FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT: "831 I love the echo of MLK! ---------- Yes1 tell ..."

Glenn John: "Deleting posts because I made mildly pessimistic c ..."

rickb223 [/s][/b][/u][/i]: "This priest is less than lukewarm. WTF? ..."

AlaBAMA: "Where's the Transgender focus? ..."

MAGA_Ken: "TRUMP! ..."

eleven: "Hah. King o the World!!! ..."

Soothsayer: " noood ..."

ALH is a girl: "NOOD!!! ..."

Tom Servo: "About time! ..."

runner : "AMEN! *oh, were are not done yet ?? ..."

ALH is a girl: "yesss! ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64