Sponsored Content




Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

NoVaMoMe 2024: 06/08/2024
Arlington, VA
Details to follow


Texas MoMe 2024: 10/18/2024-10/19/2024 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Clinton In Red-Faced Rage Over Suggestion He Spared Bin Ladin | Main | Good Point »
September 22, 2006

Waterboarding Allowed?

Mary Lederman's done what I haven't -- actually read the language of the compromise.

This is perhaps more of a victory for Jacksonian pragmatists than we thought:

More important is the bill's definition of "serious physical pain or suffering." One would think that, on any reasonable understanding of ordinary language, the "alternative" CIA techniques do, indeed, result in serious physical suffering, at the very least. Indeed, such serious suffering - and the prospect of ending such suffering by telling one's interrogators what they wish to hear - is the whole point of using such techniques in the first place. But remarkably - and not accidently - the bill's definition would not cover all such actual "serious physical suffering."

The definition would require, for one thing, a "bodily injury" - something that would not necessarily result from use of the CIA techniques - even though one can of course be subject to great physical suffering without any "physical injury."

What's worse, such physical injury would also have to "involve" at least one of the following:

(1) a substantial risk of death;

(2) extreme physical pain;

(3) a burn or physical disfigurement of a serious nature, not to include cuts, abrasions, or bruises; or

(4) significant loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty.

As you can see, this definition simply does not cover many categories of actual serious physical suffering, including, naturally, the physical suffering that ordinarily results from the CIA techniques that have been reported.

The result, unfortunately, is a very constrained conception of what constitutes "cruel treatment" - a much narrower conception than a fair or reasonable interpretation of Geneva Article 3(1)(a) would provide.

He's obviously against this. I'm delighted.

St. Andrew of the Sacred Heart-Ache is chagrined, appalled, gob-smacked, and in all manner of ways very put-out.

Hmmm... Not that it's important, but we know how Andi turns on former heroes who break his heart.

Is John McCain now going to get the full hell-hath-no-fury treatment? Fingers crossed!

The Senators' Understanding... seems to be that waterboarding is prohibited:

"The deal sets more stringent standards for what constitutes a felony under the War Crimes Act, which a Senate aide close to the negotiations said would bar waterboarding to simulate drowning and other extremely harsh interrogation techniques."

Lederman addresses this, though (as does Sullivan). Since this is the gray area the compromise does not address, it is possible the President has one understanding and the Senators have another.

Of course, a gray area is not clear authorization, either. But there seems to be wiggle room.

The President can push the agreement more to his understanding with a signing statement and by using Executive Orders to further refine and define the agreement, as the agreement expressly contemplates.

I doubt he'll claim waterboarding is permissible. He may, however, vaguely state that interogations techniques producing a great deal of "discomfort" due to "involuntary bodily reactions" are permissible, though.

It's hard to prosecute someone under a vague law in any event. The fact that the law now seems to permit a great deal of coercion should help protect CIA interrogators from prosecution. If the law permits A, B, C, and D, it's hard to argue a vaguely worded law outlaws the similar practice of E.

Would someone be forewarned by the law clearly that they're committing a crime by using technique E? Without this agreement, perhaps. But with the agreement permitting A, B, C, and D, it's harder to argue that waterboarding is illegal.


digg this
posted by Ace at 09:05 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
DOYLE: "The Muppet show came on after Wild Kingdom where I ..."

Thomas Paine: "https://images.app.goo.gl/awdgt1b7QSymWxL4A Gre ..."

Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden: "[i] Hookers and Blackjack! ~ Bender Posted by ..."

Weasel: " 103 So what was the 8 billion spent on? Posted ..."

Smell the Glove: "@111 Ellison looks like she skated face first into ..."

Yudhishthira's Dice: "This is bullshit. SBF stole an order of magnitude ..."

DoublySymmetric: "103 So what was the 8 billion spent on? Posted by ..."

Jim Fowler: "100 Mr. Perkins will be missed. Posted by: DOYLE ..."

Mike Hammer, etc., etc.: "So, I assume that Ellison is going to skate? ..."

Dr Huge Largemeat: " What sleazy methods will those psychos use n ..."

Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden: "[i]SBF will leave prison and become a fraudster al ..."

bonhomme[/i][/i][/i][/b][/b][/b][/s][/s][/s][/u][/u][/u]: "> How does that work? They basically broke ever ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64