Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















AP Insider Leak: Why The AP Is So Biased Against Israel | Main | Reuters Prints YET ANOTHER Picture & Caption Of Same Flattened Building, Claiming It Was Flattened "Overnight;" Then Stealthilly Corrects, Without Admitting Error
August 11, 2006

Another Idiotic Editorial

I can't even bother with this stupidity. It's little more than the typical ignorant cant.

But let cite this one squeaky little fart of nonsense:

Yesterday, Cheney bashed those who voted for Democrat Ned Lamont in the Connecticut Senate primary, claiming that these votes would encourage "al Qaeda types" to think that "they can break the will of the American people."

The idea is that since 18-year incumbent Joe Lieberman lost based on his support for Iraq, Americans opposing the war are waving a white flag of surrender to terrorists.

...

For Cheney - and other Republicans like GOP National Chairman Ken Mehlman - to suggest that those Americans are encouraging terrorism is reprehensible.

Dear, would that be "reprehensible" in the same way that constantly claiming that Bush is "creating more terrorists" than he is stopping, or that Bush is "provoking Al Qaeda to attack us through his belligerency," or that America is "the greatest recruitment tool Osama bin Ladin ever had" are each "reprehensible"?

Why should it be that suggesting that one policy encourages the terrorists is "reprehensible," whereas suggesting that a different policy encourages the terrorists is simply the standard liberal line (and, of course, "THE TRUTH")?

Is the Philadelphia Daily News guilty of such absurdly-obvious double-standards? Of course they are. These idiots can't even keep such suggestions out of the very editorial condemning this "reprehensible" practice:

The immoral and ridiculous claims coming out of the Bush administration's reign of error could ultimately be responsible for the kind of casualties that al Qaeda can only dream of.

Ah. Bush and Cheney's claims and policies can lead to massive casualties, but it's "reprehensible" to suggest that Lamont's might.

Gotcha.

Can't have it both ways, assholes. It's either reprhensible to suggest such a thing or it's not. If it is reprehensible, than stop doing it yourselves. If it's not-- then keep doing it, but stop whining about it all the time.

Grown ups -- not including the Philadelphia Daily News' editorial board -- disagree on what the proper way to fight terrorists might be, and of course the wrong way to fight terrorists will encourage them and allow them greater freedom to commit mass murder.

Obviously different people believe their preferred policy to be optimal, that is, leading to the fewest terrorist-inflicted casualties. That means all other policies are sub-optimal, and lead to greater terrorist-inflicted deaths.

There is an important policy dispute here. Personally, I think Cheney has the better of it, but opinions may vary. Either way, I will not be shouted down by preening, tantrum-throwing children every time I try to advocate for my preferred policy solution.

This is just a constant refrain from the left. Free speech for me, but not for thee. And yet we're the ones guilty of "chilling" speech.

I ain't chilling your speech, morons. I'm posting it. Disseminating it. Because I happen to think your speech is self-refuting.

Meanwhile, you're the thugs attempting to mau-mau anyone who disagrees with you into silence.

Won't work. Keep on trying, though. This tactic has be so very effective for you these past five years.

Has Cheney completely lost it?

Has the Philadelphia Daily News completely lost it?

You be the judge.

Thanks to Confederate Yankee.


digg this
posted by Ace at 06:06 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
The Button Down Mind: "Bob Newhart is, was, and forevermore shall be, the ..."

80's music fan: "Tell us you have never met a democrat without tell ..."

LinusVanPelt : "Joe Biden: Is it live or is it memorex?? ..."

BruceWayne: "I love ya kid. Things Joe has never said to Kamala ..."

TheJamesMadison, riding the anarchy train with John Landis: "454 Boy the "chaotic" "out of control" Democrat pa ..."

no one of any consequence: "Last time I checked, and it was about 40 years ago ..."

...: "Over under on when we see the first Che style Kama ..."

Minnfidel: "I love ya kid. Things Joe has never said to Kamala ..."

runner: "BREAKING 🚨 The Whitehouse Gets Caught Usin ..."

SMOD: "First Lady Paris-Bound for Olympics to Lead Americ ..."

Warai-otoko : "Endorse is one of those words that loses its meani ..."

...: "Boy the "chaotic" "out of control" Democrat party ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64