Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















More "Confidence" Fun | Main | Tattoo Fever
June 17, 2006

E&P: Publishers Under Liberal Pressure To Drop Coulter's Column, But Thusfar Resist

I think this campaign is kind of absurd. Boondocks and Doonesbury go over the line all the time, and yet liberals don't seem to mind them all that much.

I think she shoud be criticized, not censored or denied an outlet. (At least, not before she goes, as I fear she will, full-tilt bonkers.)


A lot of people seem baffled that I'd criticize Coulter. I would ask them how they can criticize Ted Rall's "Terror Widows" cartoon, which made the exact same point Coulter did -- that the 9/11 widows are enjoying their husband's deaths -- and then give Coulter a pass.

The two cases are indistinguishable. You can either criticize both, or justify both, but you can't condemn one and justify the other. It's blatant partisan inconsistency and hypocrisy to do so. It can't be the case that Ann gets to say what Ted Rall can't because she's Ann, she's on "our side," she's one of us. That's the game the lefty moonbats play all the time, and I'm personally not playing that game.

I'm not looking for reasons to knock Ann. Quite the opposite. I consider (or did consider) ann to be on "my side," and looked for a way to distinguish the cases. I wanted to come up with a clever reason why her remarks were acceptable whereas Rall's cartoon was not. I couldn't. And it's not just because I'm not smart enough; no one has come up with a good reason.

I have the following options:

1) Support Ann blindly, and give up all future criticism of over-the-top, borderline racist or homophobic or cruel comments by the left. That would be consistent-- if I don't take Ann to task for her over-the-line stuff, then I can't take the left to task for theirs, either.

2) Engage in rank hypocrisy and blatant inconsistency to defend someone on "my side" for the exact sort of remarks that I condemn when it comes from "their side."

Well, I don't want to do the first, as their are a lot more nasty remarks coming from the left than the right, and, considerations of taste and civility aside, it makes no sense to give up so many targets on the left just to spare one person on the right.

And I can't do the second. Some of you may be capable of disengaging your critical capacities to pretend there's some difference between Rall's and Coulter's specific remarks here, but I'm not.

So, there you go.

As for the various imputations that I'm "jealous" of Ann, or that I have some personal animus against her, or that I'm kissing up the liberal media, or whatever:

1) I can't be jealous of Coulter. She's out of my league. I can't be jealous of a minor celebrity and multiple number-one author. It's like being jealous of Paul McCartney.

I'm jealous, but jealous of people somewhere within striking distance. Like bloggers who have double my traffic and twenty times my respect.

But Coulter? How could I be jealous of her?

2) I have no personal animus against her. She used to be a kind of hero of mine. Like I said, I was one of the early adopters of Coulter, and bought her first book long, long before it was on any bestseller lists, and probably before many of her defenders had really heard of her.

If I have some "personal" animus at all, it's that someone I once liked a lot is disappointing me lately. But that would explain why I bother writing about it, not what is causing me to be disappointed.

3) Yeah... I'm kissing up to the liberal media. Because, you know, if I just say the right things about Coulter, the Washington Post is going to hire me.

Please don't queer this deal for me, guys! I'm so close to that mainstream media brass ring I can taste the metal!

And, you know, I continue bending over backwards to give Coulter a pass, but she just won't let me do so. My first reaction with her "Jewish girl" comment was to defend. But the more I thought about it, the more I realized I'd be all over someone from the Daily Kos making an equivalent remark.

If Coulter's defenders have some PRINCIPLED way to defend Coulter's, errr, exuberances while continuing to condemn similar over-the-line comments from the right, please share. So far I've not seen any. All I've seen is claims that Coulter is using the left's tactics against them and the like.

I don't really see the need to use this particular tactic against them, though. Personally, I thought we were doing just fine condemning the tactic, rather than using it ourselves.

digg this
posted by Ace at 01:17 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
nurse ratched : "Good morning, ace. I hope You get a chance to ..."

Just Lily: "These videos were broadcast in real time. How ..."

[/i][/s][/b][/u]blaster: "The media is going to pump that "cheap fakes" thin ..."

Elric Blade: "I think this ends the debate over whether the cons ..."

Joe Mannix (Not a cop!): "I look forward to the coming "deep fake era." T ..."

SMOD: "HAHA ..."

MAGA_Ken: " They earn over a million when they leave office ..."

Skip: "I can't wait for August to get here and see if the ..."

blake - semi lurker in marginal standing (tT6L1): "Certainly possible. Or it could just be really dam ..."

Zombie George Orwell!: "[i]“The Party told you to reject the evidenc ..."

Archimedes: "I think we're reaching the end game of their lies. ..."

Joe Mannix (Not a cop!): "[i]Oh wow cheap fake would expensive fakes be bett ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64