Sponsored Content

Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

« Quote of the Day | Main | More Dopery From The Washington Post: "The Debate" Column Wonders Why Moussaoui Can Be Put To Death For Merely Exercising His Fifth Amendment Rights »
April 12, 2006

Newsweek: Strong Economy May Hurt Economy (!!!...?)

From the What the Eff Department Of Incredible Liberal Bias:

Productivity normally rises and falls with the business cycle. Coming out of recession, companies make do for as long as possible with the staff they have on hand. In the current upturn, corporate America has exercised unprecedented hiring restraint in order to make up for excesses of the bubble years, says Morgan Stanley chief U.S. economist Richard Berner. The upside of the "jobless recovery" was that by producing more with fewer workers, companies drove up productivity. Inflation stayed low. U.S. growth continued to outpace our major rivals, Europe and Japan, by a huge margin.

But now pent-up demand for workers looks ready to bust out. Growth in job openings is outrunning growth in the number of people with jobs. That could lead to a surge in employment—and slow the rise in output per worker. Berner is predicting that the U.S. productivity growth rate will slip back to about 2 percent this year and next.

Why should we care? Productivity growth is economic magic. It effectively sets the speed limit for inflation-free growth, because the more each worker produces, the faster companies can grow without raising prices. So a productivity slowdown would signal an end to the harmonic convergence of high growth and negligible inflation that America has enjoyed virtually uninterrupted for nearly a decade.

The basic point of the article is, as far as I know, accurate. I object to the tone. And I question the timing.

The MSM -- especially super-liberal elements of it, like Newsweek and the NYT -- are only interested in running negative stories about the economy.

When housing prices rise, property-owners are happy. They get more money for rent and sale, of course.

When housing prices fall, property owners are sad, but renters and buyers are happy.


But the press seems to selectively report the "happy" end of things when, say, Clinton is in office -- Property Values Skyrocket! Homeonwers Ecstatic! -- and the negative side when a Republican is in office -- Property Values Skyrocket; First-Time Home Buyers Cannot Afford Decent Housing; Women, Minorities Hardest Hit.

Whenever property values rise, you can write either story; they're both equally true. Homeonwers happy, renters sad.

Which of those two stories a reporter writes depends only on his sympathy for, or animus towards, the administration in power. He can always choose to write either an upbeat or downbeat story; each is always true. It's only partisan bias that makes him choose one or the other.

As is the case with this story.

Newsweek only admits now that what has been going on the past three years -- superb productivity gains, resulting in a true strengthening of the economy, growth without inflation -- was a good thing, now that it may be about to end.

Before, Newsweek bemoaned the lack of gangbusters hiring -- the "jobless economy" we've heard so very much about -- without acknowledging the upside of modest (but good) job growth was that companies were growing sensibly and strongly with respect to hiring, not overhiring in a way likely to provoke a bubble and the inevitable bursting of that bubble.

Only now that that it looks like companies are hiring a lot more people do they admit that the "jobless recovery" (which wasn't jobless at all, but whatever) was fundamentally sound.

I've noted this a bunch of times before: The MSM is only willing to acknowlege the economy is strong in stories predicting it is about to weaken. Only when the scary prediction of a collapsing economy is discussed will they admit the economy is currently actually strong.

Bush can never get the political benefit of a strong economy, because the media will never admit it as such until it has passed. Only when the business cycle turns, as it it one day will, to a recessionary period will the MSM then admit the economy had been strong.

In order to contrast what had been good to what is now bad. Without ever acknowledging things were good at the time.

And so it goes.

Productivity and job growth are always at odds. (Or almost alwaysat odds, absent some major outside change in basic productivity, as the information revolution was.) When producitivity grows, it is all but inevitable hiring will be lower, as that is, after all, the basic math of thing. Productivity means more output with less workers, after all.

When job hiring explodes, or wages grow, productivity will naturally suffer.

It's a yin-yang thing.

But the press always, relentlessly, single-mindedly emphasizes the negative side of whatever trend is in motion, and will continue doing so until the public finally listens to them and elects Hillary! to the Presidency.

Then, once again, we will only read or hear about the positive sides of the economy -- Productivity Rises! if the economy isn't producing many jobs, or Hiring Explodes! if America is producing jobs at the expense of producitivity.

So, productivity gains with modest hiring growth was a good thing all along.

Funny that Newsweek only gets around to mentioning this as many economists thing this "economic magic" is about to end.

Thanks to Robert R.

The Republican Tax: I've said this before, but I think we've got to accept we will always, as a country, have to pay a "tax" on having a Republican president in office, because the media, through relentlessly negative coverage of Republcian economies, will sabotage consumer confidence and thus reduce the actual strength of the economy (not just the perception thereof) a fraction of a percent or so.

digg this
posted by Ace at 03:02 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
browndog Official Mascot of Team Gizzard: "Way to go Fen... Truly, you are doing God's wor ..."

Braenyard: ">>> If the dopes in the GOPe elect another clown, ..."

Diogenes: "That's why he is not speaker. If the dopes in t ..."

18-1: "[i]Look for more Uke girls wanting to marry Americ ..."

kbdabear: "Al Pacino Approved ONT Compliance Pics https:/ ..."

San Franpsycho: "Good evening morons and thanks mh Photo caption ..."

COMountainMarie : "Real job got in the way today. And here I thoug ..."

Mail Order Brides by Miklos (se habla Ukrainsksi): " Look for more Uke girls wanting to marry American ..."

Child Protective Services: "Have to share...today at lunch my kid chopped up c ..."

Isolden: "399 To me, conservatism isn't "based on the preser ..."

TecumsehTea: "Alberta Oi ahh ..."

Way, Way Downriver [/i]: "Willowed for Current Events: [i]I found out ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64