Sponsored Content




Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

NoVaMoMe 2024: 06/08/2024
Arlington, VA
Details to follow


Texas MoMe 2024: 10/18/2024-10/19/2024 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Dave From Garfield Ridge Brokeback Mountain | Main | JackM. (Desolation Row) Starts Blog-War With Austria »
December 21, 2005

Declaring Hyperviolent/Ultrasexual Video Games "Obscene" For Children

I support Hillary!, and I'm against Instapundit.

Instapundit thinks this is dumb, and 7 Sins raises to "criminally stupid."

I'm not sure I understand why.

It is counterproductive and freedom-limiting to clamp down on books, movies, and games sold to adults (unless they feature genuine illegality with a victim, like child porn does).

But we're talking about children here. Are the libertarians actually saying that, as regards children, it's Thunderdome, and the state has no interest in or power to restrict the sale to pornography to minors?

Some might say videogames aren't porn... well, some are on the edge already, and it's stuff kids shouldn't be sold. There are, after all, Japanese videogames about picking up bikini girls on the beach and then having sex with them.

And the videogame industry does seem to be attempting to outdo itself as far as shock-content every year. I don't think it will be long before there's a fully-pornographic game, with well-rendered models and realistic (sorta) hardcore sex. Should such a game -- hypothetical at the moment, but likely coming down the pipeline -- be sold to a kid without the vendor being punished?

If so, why are we bothering to fine 7-11s for selling cigarettes to kids?

I think libertarianism is an important part of conservativism -- it's an intellectual undergirding of the small goverment/leave me the hell alone strain of conservative politics -- but I'm always surprised by the libertarian absolutists who apparently want no restrictions on almost any behavior at all, even when it comes to kids.

Libertarians will point out that this is a bunch of symbolic politics, and the "For the children" mantra is always a dangerous one. Well, sometimes, but not always. I don't want people to take away my choices, made as competent adult, "for the children." On the other hand, taking away some of children's opportunities to buy drugs, fireworks, cigarettes, and porn "for the children" seems pretty reasonable.

I think part of the unexpressed reservation about measures like this is that kids buy a lot of this stuff, making it commercially viable, meaning that adults who might want a very violent or hypersexual game can buy it too. Without teenagers buying some of this stuff, there's just not enough of a market for it to make it a decent seller, and thus it won't be made at all, and therefore yes, indirectly, keeping it out of the hands of kids also may keep it out of the hands of adults. Adults, to some extent, are free riders on the market for inappropriate entertainment sold to children and teenagers.

But if that's what's going on -- if these products can't be economically viable if sold only to the people they're claimed to be intended for, actual adults -- then the games probably shouldn't be made in the first place.

Am I crazy? Am I too statist here? The only thing I've ever agreed with Bill Maher on is his observation that, for many liberals and libertarians, children are just "little adults," and should be treated as such when it comes to sex and the like.

Well, no. They're children. There are some things that should not be sold to them, and if that's the case, I don't really see why a toothless "voluntary" rating system is to be preferred over a mandatory one with actual penalties.

Yes, yes, yes-- the slipperly slope. If we try to regulate the sale of patently-inappropriate products to children, suddenly the government will take all R or X rated materials from adults and we'll all be forced to watch Barney the Dinosaur for the rest of our lives.

I don't buy the slippery slope, especially here. American adults are not giving up their porn or their racy/violent/profane TV series on HBO or the like. It's just not going to happen.


digg this
posted by Ace at 12:25 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
garrett: ">>Virgin Rock. I think she's originally German. Sh ..."

Philip: "[i]107 We Baptists can drink alcohol...[/i] Spi ..."

tubal: "111 We Baptists can drink alcohol... Posted by: t ..."

Catch Thirty-Thr33: "There's one Harpist that does those and I can watc ..."

Way, Way Downriver [/i][/b]: "Any truth to the claim that minutes after Trump pa ..."

illiniwek: ""Guilty as hell, free as a bird" Obama's ghost ..."

Diogenes: "We Baptists can drink alcohol... Posted by: tubal ..."

OrangeEnt: "Yeah, I don't get those either. You can tell the " ..."

iHeart Radio: "There’s a podcast about people who give no s ..."

pookysgirl, Rush Baby: "Podcasts are just radio talk shows, with video. ..."

tubal: "We Baptists can drink alcohol... ..."

garrett: "I like the reaction videos done by the Classical M ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64