Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups


NoVaMoMe 2024: 06/08/2024
Arlington, VA
Registration Is Open!


Texas MoMe 2024: 10/18/2024-10/19/2024 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Spain Sells WMD's To Hugo Chavez | Main | The "Progressive" Left's Inconsistent Standard on Questions of Sexuality »
April 11, 2005

Gender Is A Social Construct; Doubly So When It Comes To Making a Stinky

Dudes are now allowed to use women's bathrooms. It's about f'n' time:

Earlier this month, a New York security firm settled a case that charged the company with unlawfully discriminating on the basis of "gender identity." In two incidents, representatives of the firm had questioned the use of the women's restroom by persons who, while biologically male, identify themselves as female.

By so doing, the firm thereby violated New York City's Human Rights Law, as construed in official guidelines promulgated in 2002. The settlement requires the defendant to pay each claimant $2500 and to take measures to comply with the law in the future.

Just days earlier, in an unrelated case, a New York State intermediate appellate court had issued a contrary ruling. The court concluded that the city's ban on transgender discrimination is not violated by requiring transgendered persons to use the restrooms designated for persons with their biological sex.

Resolving the conflicting authorities may require further administrative, legislative and judicial action at the city and state level. In the meantime, New Yorkers and others will be left puzzling over a surprisingly difficult question: Who should be permitted to use the men's and women's rooms, respectively?

Hmmmm... just an idea. How about men use men's bathrooms, and women use women's?

Transendered persons--people whose dress, mannerisms, speech patterns and social interactions do not match the typical pattern for those with their biological sex--are frequently victims of unfair discrimination.

A biological "man" who experiences life as a woman, and who speaks and dresses accordingly, may be no less capable of performing surgery or balancing corporate accounts than a man (or woman) who happily accepts the gender society prescribes for him (or her). And yet the transgendered person will, because of prejudice, have a harder time finding a welcoming employer.

Accordingly, it is perfectly appropriate, and indeed, laudable, for New York City's Human Rights Law to prohibit gender identity discrimination.

Note that the concept of "transgenedered" has been defined rather expansively here. It's not merely restricted to those who have undergone (or are undergoing) sex reassignment surgery, or to those whose genitals are indistinct or hermaphroaditic (as is the case with Hoke Malokey and, of course, JeffB.).

No, it also includes "people whose dress, mannerisms, speech patterns and social interactions do not match the typical pattern for those with their biological sex." Which, you know, also seems to include transvestites -- the majority of whom are actually straight, I'm told. (They just like to feel pretty... and who can blame us?)

I have no doubt that those afflicted (and I'll catch heat for that word, of course) with an ambiguous sexuality are subject to discrimination, conscious and unconscious, subtle and overt.

But I also think that women are entitled to know their bathrooms are a penis-free zone. That does not strike me as an unreasonable expectation.

It may be that there large corporations can, and should, provide "Co-Ed" or "Other" bathrooms on every other floor as a reasonable accomodation to that tiny fraction of the population whose sex is indisctinct or subject to debate. Somehow, though, I think New York's ultraliberal judges will find that the "every other floor" rule inherently discriminatory -- hell, half of three people working at a large corporation whose sex is indistinct might have to take the stairs or elevator to make a pee-pee -- and that there is an inherent stigma associated with "Third Way" bathrooms.

Questions like this always involve a balance of the competing (and legitimate) interests of a minority population and the majority. But for the liberal judges that invest the northeast courts, there is no balance -- the minority always prevails, and the majority's interests are always trumped.

So, ladies, you're on notice. If you're kinda hot and headed to the can, I just might decide I'm feeling a bit more in touch with my feminine side than usual. And I trust the New York Courts will back me up in my quest to spy through the cracks in the bathroom-stall's door.

Thanks to RCL.


digg this
posted by Ace at 11:11 AM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
[/i][/s][/b][/u]blaster: "I am guessing we just aren't economically sophisti ..."

Warai-otoko: "Don't forget the Satanists. Posted by: jim (in Ka ..."

Ted Torgerson : "The trend is your friend. If we lived in pre-C ..."

LenNeal: "a $15 code reader from Walmart can clear that righ ..."

Adirondack Patriot: "Don't know if it has been stated, but that 1.6% wi ..."

Alberta Oil Peon: "Just planting the seeds for when another agent pro ..."

jim (in Kalifornia)[/b][/s][/i][/u]: "43 >Oh, please no! No trans in the SS. Please mak ..."

Gaff: "Thank goodness they increased the chocolate ration ..."

jim (in Kalifornia)[/b][/s][/i][/u]: "40 Periodically one nood is chosen to bear the sin ..."

rickb223 [/s][/b][/i][/u]: "I only bust on them to demonstrate how there is no ..."

Nova Local: "366 I just saw a story Legal Insurrection that Col ..."

Don Black: ">Oh, please no! No trans in the SS. Please make i ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64