Intermarkets' Privacy Policy Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ! Recent Entries
An ONT For All Seasons
Rescue Me Cafe Ron DeSantis' Emergency Response Efforts are Proceeding Crisply While FEMA is Short-Staffed Due to Providing "Services" For Illegal Aliens at Harris and Biden's Dissolved Border Quick Hits Folie a DUH: Studio Scrambling to Figure Out Why a Movie That Was an Undisguised "F*** You" to Its Fans Failed to Find an Audience In Bizarre Attempt at Viral Vote-Getting Stunt, Governess Gretchen Whitmer Feeds Doritos to an Influencer on Her Knees In Offensive Mockery of the Giving of the Holy Eucharist Elderly Internet Spinster Taylor Lorenz Repeatedly Lied to Her Bosses, Says NPR Hit Piece CBS Owner Shari Redstone Backs Reporter Tony Dokoupil Over His Woke Inquisitors The Morning Rant: Minimalist Edition Mid-Morning Art Thread Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024 Captain Hate 2023 moon_over_vermont 2023 westminsterdogshow 2023 Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022 Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022 redc1c4 2021 Tami 2021 Chavez the Hugo 2020 Ibguy 2020 Rickl 2019 Joffen 2014 AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
|
« Lost in the Celebration: Bobby Jindal Finally Won |
Main
| I Loves Me Some Blogads »
November 04, 2004
On the Exit Poll DebaclePowerline Blog indulges a reader's conspiracy theory, and then knocks it down to some extent. Here's what I have heard and what I think. 1. The polling company itself isn't necessarily dirty. Even assuming that there was some underhanded activity going on here, the polling company itself isn't necessarily the bad guy. It only takes one rogue employee to leak something-- remember Bush's debate-prep tape? The polling company defends itself by noting that they didn't release the data themselves, and furthermore, that the data was actually correct, in the sense that those were the numbers they had-- the numbers, it just turned out, were utterly unrepresentative of the actual situation. 2. But there is good reason to suspect skullduggery. Dick Morris has of course already suggested that the numbers were "juiced" by someone, somewhere. How? The theory he offered that makes the most sense is that someone in the polling outfit leaked to the Kerry campaign which precincts would be subject to exit interviews, and then the Kerry camp (or someone in it) flooded those polling places with plants who would just walk in to the polls, then walk out, then fill out the card claiming they'd voted for Kerry (which they had not, that not being their actual polling place). Now, there may be some doubts about Dick Morris' reliability, but there are few doubts about Michael Barrone's, and yesterday on Special Report with Brit Hume he suggested the same theory-- and while he didn't, I think, say he suspected an attempt to defraud the poll, he didn't seem to think it was something that could be dismissed out of hand. Apparently this has been done before-- he had a bit of polling jargon to describe the practice: "slamming" the exit polls. Morris is very insistent that exit polls are the most accurate of all polls, and that it's very unlikely they could be this far off absent conscious design by someone, somewhere. 3. The exit polls have been shown to be utter rubbish, and yet the Democrats and their liberal media Spirit Squad are still quoting from them. The numbers were simply bad-- they showed a coming landslide for Kerry, which was just not what happened. So if the numbers were off on the head-to-head horserace, why are liberals continuing to cite the erroneous polls for the non-horserace data? How can they keep claiming that based on the polls, at least, the American people are disatisfied with the war in Iraq or the economy? The polls are wrong, guys; you've admitted it. So you can't use them for any purpose. They were unrepresentative and possibly tampered with for all questions, not just Kerry versus Bush. So knock it off. Other polls indicate the American people have doubts about Iraq and the economy. Fine-- cite those. But stop pretending that the exit polls can be relied upon to answer these questions. 4. The liberal media is using this fiasco as an attack on blogs. And to some extent, they've got a point-- a bit of one, at least. It was the blogworld that actually reported the data to the public. I don't know who leaked, but it's likely that Kerry partisans leaked to bloggers in order to depress Republican turnout. To defend some bloggers -- including myself -- conservative bloggers immediately and forcefully reported that the data was likely erroneous when we learned that the male/female split was 41-59. So, yes, we got it wrong, but then we corrected. At least some of us did. Which brings me to the real villain of this story. 5. William Saletan, of the amateur leftist webzine Slate, published the faulty data, but then never reported that the data was likely erronoeous. Why? Drudge posted the faulty data; but then he splashed cold water on the numbers by reporting the hinky male/female split. He also reported how badly off the 2000 exit polls had been. So did NRO, both in the Corner and at KerrySpot. So did I, for that matter. William Saletan never did. At least, not that I saw, and not until all the polls in the country had pretty much closed, and the media was ready to start calling states for Bush. Not nearly good enough, Saletan. Curious. After making a big statement about how the public needed to be informed as fully as possible, he then withheld information that he obviously had (it's ludicrous that no one in the RNC emailed him, or that he never checked Drudge). Withheld it from the public he claimed he felt such a responsibility to inform fully. Why? He will claim that he offered caveats about exit polls earlier in the day, and said that such data do not necessarily forecast a winner. But a general caveat is generally unheeded. When he had specific information that the data was almost certainly wrong, why did he offer no specific caveats as he gleefully continued reporting a Kerry sweep? Having put wrong information out there, didn't he feel a particular need to debunk his own false reportage? I don't know why he never saw fit to enlighten his readers. I could guess that, like his comrades in the MSM, perhaps he was so depressed he couldn't bring himself to write the hateful words Kerry might not win; you can't trust these numbers. Which says a lot about media reliability, right there. They want to believe what they want to believe, and, worse yet, they want you to also believe what they want to believe. But it might be worse still. I can't help suspecting that Saletan wasn't especially upset by the thought that the numbers he was publishing -- numbers he had to know by 5:00 were probably bad -- were helping to depress Republican turnout. Whether those numbers were right or wrong. Jack Shafer offers some uninteresting musings on the subject, but never even hints at why Slate's exit-poll go-to guy was so blithe about warning his readers that there was specific reason to doubt the numbers he had been reporting all day long. Until Saletan explains himself, I will continue to have suspicions. I should repeat that fairly late at night, Saletan did express his belief that Kerry might lose. I can't be more specific than "fairly late," because that part of Saletan's blogging no longer is part of the article. The updates stop at four o'clock or five or so now. Certainly I recall nothing about wildly unrepresentative sampling. If I recall correctly, however, he began his post expressing the possibility of a Kerry loss thus: I hate writing this, but... I'll say, William. | Recent Comments
See? Nobody cares:
"first? ..."
Nightwatch: "For now it seems... Donald Trump will be our Jo ..." Werner Herzog Has Opinions: "Werner has great fondness for the kitty cats, as C ..." TexasDan: "Probably too late but it's Tanah Lot. ..." Pug Mahon, Jailhouse Bones Parker: "My apologies you must understand. Living in thi ..." B.F. Skinner: "211 That walk down to the ocean look like a dragon ..." publius, Rascally Mr. Miley (w6EFb): " See the SOHO image here: https://tinyurl.com/ ..." Nightwatch: "209 FLAME...retracted!!! My apologies you mu ..." GWB: "That walk down to the ocean look like a dragon nec ..." Lurking Lurker who lurks lurkingly: "Posted by: Nightwatch at October 10, 2024 09:44 PM ..." Pug Mahon, Jailhouse Bones Parker: "202 OH very well then ...you must be all for PR ..." Kindltot: "I got an offer in 2020 to work pot harvest in Oreg ..." Recent Entries
An ONT For All Seasons
Rescue Me Cafe Ron DeSantis' Emergency Response Efforts are Proceeding Crisply While FEMA is Short-Staffed Due to Providing "Services" For Illegal Aliens at Harris and Biden's Dissolved Border Quick Hits Folie a DUH: Studio Scrambling to Figure Out Why a Movie That Was an Undisguised "F*** You" to Its Fans Failed to Find an Audience In Bizarre Attempt at Viral Vote-Getting Stunt, Governess Gretchen Whitmer Feeds Doritos to an Influencer on Her Knees In Offensive Mockery of the Giving of the Holy Eucharist Elderly Internet Spinster Taylor Lorenz Repeatedly Lied to Her Bosses, Says NPR Hit Piece CBS Owner Shari Redstone Backs Reporter Tony Dokoupil Over His Woke Inquisitors The Morning Rant: Minimalist Edition Mid-Morning Art Thread Search
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Primary Document: The Audio
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings) George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer Top Top Tens
Democratic Forays into Erotica New Shows On Gore's DNC/MTV Network Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes Star Wars Euphemisms for Self-Abuse Signs You're at an Iraqi "Wedding Party" Signs Your Clown Has Gone Bad Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up Signs of Hip-Hop Influence on John Kerry NYT Headlines Spinning Bush's Jobs Boom Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?" Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' Mind All-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care Anymore Examples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery Signs Andy Rooney Is Going Senile Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance Collective Names for Groups of People John Kerry's Other Vietnam Super-Pets Cool Things About the XM8 Assault Rifle Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat Spy Changes to Make Christianity More "Inclusive" Secret John Kerry Senatorial Accomplishments John Edwards Campaign Excuses John Kerry Pick-Up Lines Changes Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney Torments in Dog-Hell Greatest Hitjobs
The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny More Margaret Cho Abuse Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed" Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means Wonkette's Stand-Up Act Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report! Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet The House of Love: Paul Krugman A Michael Moore Mystery (TM) The Dowd-O-Matic! Liberal Consistency and Other Myths Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate "Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long) The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) |