Intermarkets' Privacy Policy Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ! Contact
Ace:aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com Recent Entries
Monday Overnight Open Thread - January 20, 2025 [Doof]
Invasion of the Apple Snatchers Cafe At Last Night's Rally, Trump Was Joined on the Stage By His Strongest Totally-Not-Gay Supporters Quick Hits Surprise: Defender of Normzzz and Protector of the Criminal FBI Pardons Terrorist Who Murdered Two FBI Agents Quick Update on "Team DeLulu" Cope Border Patrol Trucks Are En Route to the Southern Border Elections Have Consequences: The TSA Official Who Put Tulsi Gabbard on the Terrorist Watch List Has Been Fired The Inaugural Ceremonies, Continued "A Revolution of Common Sense:" Trump's Inaugural Address "For Americans, January 20, 2025 is Liberation Day." Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024 Captain Hate 2023 moon_over_vermont 2023 westminsterdogshow 2023 Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022 Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022 redc1c4 2021 Tami 2021 Chavez the Hugo 2020 Ibguy 2020 Rickl 2019 Joffen 2014 AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
|
« Today's Top Ten |
Main
| Industrial Output Unexpectedly Drops 2.3%... »
May 07, 2004
Andrew Sullivan: RadicalIf you're not following it, there's a dust-up between Andrew "The Sage" Sullivan and NRO's Jonah Goldberg. Andrew "The Sage" Sullivan shrieks about that a Virginia law stating that contracts entered into which purport to "to bestow the privileges and obligations of marriage" between two people of the same sex are null and void. He claims that such a law would actually outlaw most private agreements between gays, stripping them of even the most basic capacity to make private contracts. This is, of course, utter nonsense. If you are in a contract to rent an apartment, you are forbidden to enter into contracts of your own in which you purport to own the apartment; you are forbidden, in other words, to enter into contracts under the color of ownership. That doesn't mean you can't freely enter legal contracts to sub-let your apartment and the like. It means what it means: some contracts are forbidden, because you just don't have the right -- here, actual ownership -- to enter into them. Gays can enter into all the private contracts they like, except that sort of contract which is forbidden: a marriage contract, or a contract purporting to bestow the incidents and obligations of marriage. Obviously, we think. Updated... on the jump. This has been The Sage's tactic for some time. He claims that most versions of the FMA, for example, prohibit civil unions. They do no such thing. They prohibit actual marriage. But he is forever claiming that pro-gay-marriage proposals will have minimal legal effect -- they will never operate outside a state's borders, they never call into operation the Full Faith & Credit Clause, etc. -- while claiming utterly ridiculous maximalist effect of any anti-gay-marriage proposal. In The Sage's reading, the Virginia law would, apparently, void a purely business-related partnership contract entered into by two gay men. He doesn't believe the law will do any such thing, but he claims it will in order to mau-mau liberal-leaning Republicans into opposing it. It's not the "unstated, implied effects" (as he'd term them) of these laws he is actually objecting to, although he pretends that therin lies the kernel of his opposition. He objects to the stated, express effects of these laws, that is, to ban gay marriage, and attempts to convince people that they should oppose such laws because of alleged unstated, implied effects which exist chiefly in his own imagination. It's like someone saying you can't oppose racial-quotas because doing so would have the "unstated, implied effect" of repealing the 14th Amendment. Did we mention that The Sage has absolutely no legal education or training whatsoever, and has indeed not even been an interested amateur on the topic of law in the past? One can comb through The Sage's oevure for days at a time without finding a single reference to jurisprudence, but suddenly he's a self-declared expert on Virginia contracts and the legal construction of Virgina laws. He's not a legal expert, on the law regarding gay marriage or any other sort of law, and it's past time people like Jonah stopped treating him as if he were. Just because you're gay doesn't mean you're an expert on "gay law." You don't lay down with a man and then rise with a degree from Columbia Law. There's a simple reason to shrug at The Sage's myriad ludicrous charges: 1) he doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about and 2) he misrepresents these laws and proposals at every turn in full awareness that he doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about and 3) to the extent he knows what the fuck he's talking about, he knows he's wrong. He is a committed advocate on the issue, and an advocate utterly ignorant of the law, and yet Jonah Goldberg repeatedly accepts The Sage's premises as if they were considered legal opinions. At least Goldberg has the backbone to now state what Sullivan clearly is: a radical, and a rather nasty ad hominem one at that. Here's his surrebuttal to The Sage's rebuttal: He says he's no radical because his position hasn't changed. Maybe so, but his rhetorical tactics have. It seems to me Andrew used to condemn the gay left for its totalizing attitude toward politics. Andrew's position now is that conservatives are immoral for fighting laws he disagrees with and for not-fighting laws he disagrees with. The only safe harbor appears to be agreeing with Andrew with the same amount of passion as Andrew, otherwise you're a "theocon" or some such.... [A]ndrew increasingly seems to have the same contempt for my lack of passion about gay rights as a Bolshevik had for a Social Democrat. I just don't think that's a good or smart approach for his side of the debate. Update, as an Open Letter to Jonah Goldberg: We take it, Jonah, that when Jesse Jackson makes claims regarding the effect of proposed legislation he opposes, you greet his interpretations with a fair amount of skepticism. We take it you don't immediately assume the facts are as he claims them to be, simply because he is either A) Jesse Jackson or B) black, and therefore wise and learned on the topic of civil-rights legislation. And, it should be noted, in all fairness to Mr. Jackson, he probably does actually have a working knowlege, at least of a fragmentary kind, about civil rights law, having been an interested advocate on the issue for 40 or 50 years. What, praytell, leads you assume that Andrew Sullivan is a legal expert? Can you site his previous analysis of legal cases as evidence of at least an amateur-level interest in the subject? If you can't, could you please explain to us why you greet his claims with very little skepticism at all? Surely you can't imagine that homosexuals have an inborn expertise on legal analysis and precedent regarding gay issues. Has he provided any legal citations for his claims? We haven't seen them. We stronlgy suspect there are no actual legal citations for any of these claims. We suspect his "source" for these claims is not anything to be found in the law at all; we think he just takes the HRC newsletter, adds some of his trademark ad hominem, and then prints it up as a legal analysis. Here's a dandy little example of why you shouldn't blindly trust ignorant, dedicated advocates on questions involving the law. Seems some people claim and/or believe that failing to renew the Voting Rights Act of 1965 would result in blacks no longer having the right to vote. Not true, of course. But the idea of it generates a lot of angry passion from concerned, but ignorant, citizens. It's just too precious: The Shrill Sage accuses his enemies -- "theoconservatives," in his preferred cutesy name-calling fashion -- of having become "emotive." Right, Sully. We wouldn't want any hysterical feminine emotion intruding into this rational back-and-forth we're having. | Recent Comments
JackStraw:
"If Trump was a real president he would volunteer H ..."
Braenyard - some Absent Friends are more equal than others _ : " 513 And why do I have to listen to Metallica on M ..." Cheri: "581 - just his part. The rest had to be better. ..." Miklos McMiklos, of the Auld and Ancient Clan McMiklos: "Raising a glass to morons present and departed, pl ..." Jane D'oh: "Come on, Trump. An eager nation waits to see what ..." nurse ratched, garbage: "Didn't one of MLK's daughters endorse Trump? ..." Martini Farmer: "The majority of federal employees spend their time ..." Diogenes: "Damn...was it that bad? Posted by: eleven at Janu ..." Pug Mahon, Day 7 of Funemployment: "I pretty much stopped watching the inaugural stuff ..." bluebell: "Sheesh. More blathering. ..." Alberta Oil Peon: "I haven't been there, but there is a place in Flat ..." Axeman: "Liberty Ball is best. Posted by: Boss Moss at Jan ..." Recent Entries
Monday Overnight Open Thread - January 20, 2025 [Doof]
Invasion of the Apple Snatchers Cafe At Last Night's Rally, Trump Was Joined on the Stage By His Strongest Totally-Not-Gay Supporters Quick Hits Surprise: Defender of Normzzz and Protector of the Criminal FBI Pardons Terrorist Who Murdered Two FBI Agents Quick Update on "Team DeLulu" Cope Border Patrol Trucks Are En Route to the Southern Border Elections Have Consequences: The TSA Official Who Put Tulsi Gabbard on the Terrorist Watch List Has Been Fired The Inaugural Ceremonies, Continued "A Revolution of Common Sense:" Trump's Inaugural Address "For Americans, January 20, 2025 is Liberation Day." Search
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Primary Document: The Audio
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings) George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer Top Top Tens
Democratic Forays into Erotica New Shows On Gore's DNC/MTV Network Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes Star Wars Euphemisms for Self-Abuse Signs You're at an Iraqi "Wedding Party" Signs Your Clown Has Gone Bad Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up Signs of Hip-Hop Influence on John Kerry NYT Headlines Spinning Bush's Jobs Boom Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?" Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' Mind All-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care Anymore Examples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery Signs Andy Rooney Is Going Senile Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance Collective Names for Groups of People John Kerry's Other Vietnam Super-Pets Cool Things About the XM8 Assault Rifle Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat Spy Changes to Make Christianity More "Inclusive" Secret John Kerry Senatorial Accomplishments John Edwards Campaign Excuses John Kerry Pick-Up Lines Changes Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney Torments in Dog-Hell Greatest Hitjobs
The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny More Margaret Cho Abuse Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed" Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means Wonkette's Stand-Up Act Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report! Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet The House of Love: Paul Krugman A Michael Moore Mystery (TM) The Dowd-O-Matic! Liberal Consistency and Other Myths Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate "Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long) The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) |