Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Mid-Morning Art Thread | Main | Claim: Tucker Carlson Tried to Get Fox Hatchet-Woman Irena Briganti Fired
May 08, 2023

THE MORNING RANT: Some Good News for Red States…the Left is Seeking to Delegitimize the Imperial Judiciary

Scale of Justice - Broken.JPG

There is a vicious smear campaign going on by Democrats and their media allies against conservative Supreme Court justices, especially Clarence Thomas. The purpose of these attacks, of course, is to neutralize the authority of the conservative majority on the Supreme Court, and perhaps to even remove a member or two by impeachment. Others in conservative media have done a great job covering this coordinated media attack, so that is not what I am writing about today.

Beyond removing justices, the left has made it clear that if it has lost its iron-fisted control of the judiciary, then the judiciary’s role in governing the country is henceforth illegitimate.

Good. I agree. The judiciary’s role in governing our lives is illegitimate, and has been for a very long time.

A country that considers itself a “democracy” (or a “representative republic,” or whatever term indicates that the people elect their government) cannot have an unelected, unaccountable, and unreplaceable judiciary that has arrogated unto itself the power to govern, irrespective of laws and lawmakers.

Don’t misunderstand, wherever the right has gained control of the courts, we should use the courts to advance our agenda, just like the left did. There is nothing principled about judicial restraint if only one side employs it. But any control we currently have over a subset of the nation’s courts is itself fleeting, since the left conquers all unelected institutions.

It’s not just the political balance of the Supreme Court that has made the left apoplectic. Thanks to Donald Trump’s judicial appointments, many lower courts have also tilted right. The left is learning that “government by judges” doesn’t always work in their favor.

The 5th Circuit Is the Blown Fuse of American Jurisprudence [Esquire – 01/30/2023]

If you want to fast-track a truly terrible idea to the carefully engineered conservative majority on the Supreme Court, the best way to do it is to file it in Texas. If your case fails there, take it down to the 5th Circuit for some CPR. Once there, your chances to prevail are fairly good. This forces the other side to throw itself on the tender mercies of the Alito Court.

This is from the Washington Post, as quoted in that Esquire article:

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit in New Orleans has long leaned conservative. But the arrival of a half-dozen judges picked by President Donald Trump — many of them young, ambitious and outspoken — has put the court at the forefront of resistance to the Biden administration’s assertions of legal authority and to the regulatory power of federal agencies. Their rulings have at times broken with precedent and exposed rifts among the judges, illustrating Trump’s lasting legacy on the powerful set of federal courts that operate one step below the Supreme Court.

Never forget that all those highly principled NeverTrump Republicans who preferred Hillary (and Biden) to Trump would also prefer to have our courts packed with leftists rather than the conservatives that Trump appointed. (I’ll admit that I was a Walker/Cruz NeverTrumper in 2016, but I ultimately voted for Trump because of the courts. Specifically, there was a 0% chance that Hillary would appoint conservatives, and although I had serious doubts about Trump, there was a better-than-zero chance he would appoint conservatives, and he generally did.)

That said, government by a conservative judiciary is not feasible nor sustainable, and where we have had victories, the left will ensure that it never happens again. That is why court packing and impeachment of conservative justices is so high on the left’s wish list right now.

Above all else, conservative governance is almost impossible when seemingly any and every conservative law that is passed is likely to be blocked by some judge – any judge – and thus the will of the people is subjugated to the will of individual, unelected judges. There are thousands of examples, but this one is recent and relevant.

Judge Blocks Tennessee Law Restricting Drag Performances in Public [Reuters – 4/03/2023]

We all learned in civics classes about our government’s system of checks and balances, but there is no check on the judiciary. One federal judge has taken it upon himself to stop implementation of a state law, and there is no legal recourse against this judge. The state of Tennessee can’t remove him from office or vote to overturn his ruling, nor will Congress impeach him.

The only check on this rogue judge is that another judge will overrule him. Thus there is no “check” on his power from any other branch of government.

Some people argue that the “check” on judicial activism is to win elections and have better people appointed, but that is like stating that the check on unconstitutional legislation resides at the ballot box, and that the courts should have no authority. (Which is an argument I’m receptive to discussing at this point.)

There is no check on our omnipotent judiciary from the other two branches of government, and conservatives have never had the fortitude to even impeach one left-wing judge. It is understood by all parties that conservative legislation is usually DOA, even if passed into law by the legislative and executive branches, because the left can go judge-shopping and find one “Hawaiian Judge” somewhere to throw the legislation out.

If the left refusing to consent to a right-wing court brings a halt to the era of judicial tyranny, then that is a positive development.

Andrew Jackson is alleged to have responded to Supreme Court Justice John Marshall in regards to the Worcester vs Georgia case, "John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it."

It would warm my heart to hear Joe Biden, or Gavin Newsom, or Kathy Hochul, or some other elected Democrat executive effectively state "Samuel Alito has made his decision, now let him enforce it."

There is clearly momentum building among the left to delegitimize any conservative court and its rulings so that the left can govern independently of the courts. Those terms are acceptable, so long as the right follows suit and does the same.

Red states will be much freer if emancipated from the tyranny of unelected judges.

[buck.throckmorton at protonmail dot com]

digg this
posted by Buck Throckmorton at 11:00 AM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
Iran #1!!: "The Iron Sheik passed on last year, I believe. The ..."

Malcolm Tent: "[i]"A leader's duty is to his people and to his co ..."

Tammy-al Thor: "Cenk started out as one of us. I've always liked h ..."

Soothsayer : " The other night when the president closed his ey ..."

Moron Analyst: "499 Hogan was really good. Almost seemed like he i ..."

Mike Hammer, etc., etc.: "NBC cuts away from Franklin Graham's prayer ..."

Sasquatch, the Original Trans-Wookie: "I used to work upstairs from The Warlord's dad, so ..."

[/i]blaster: "I have heard many renditions of When the Man Comes ..."

Unknown Drip Under Pressure: "[i]The Man Comes Around" - I love that song. There ..."

The Unvaxed and Unmasked Ranger : "The real question is, What Does Matt Walsh think a ..."

JackStraw: ">>An entertainer is wearing fake hair? The nerve! ..."

DangerGirl lost the SanityProd (tm): "TRUMP SLEEPING AGAIN! THIS TIME STANDING UP! ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64