Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!
Top Headlines
Etymologies: hussy and gussy
Hussy was just originally a slurred/shortened version of housewife, that meant only that. But, you know, all words for women are eventually given some venom and vinegar. My guess is that insults like "dirty hussy" and "cheap hussy" were tossed around so much that the word just lost its original neutral meaning and now was only thought of in a derogatory way.
Gussy, as in "gussied up," is a recent invention, and either comes from 40s schoolyard slang for "overly dressed" which in turn might come from "gussie," meaning effeminate man or "foppish dandy,", starting around 1901 in Australia.
Apparently "jessie" is still used in Australia and England to mean "effeminate man.
Muldoon: A Last Limerick
NeverTrump hero Evan McMullin: Hillary Clinton is right, Tulsi is a Russian agent
Everyone who disagrees with the liberal DC consensus is a Russian, a Racist, or a Russian Racist.
Dancing in the Streets, No Music Silent Video Version
Really funny. It's old, but still funny.
Mitt Romney, who is America's number one geopolitical foe, claims Turkey is a "small country"
Kyle Sheideler responds that he is anti-Turkey and doesn't wish them to be a part of NATO, but Mitt Romney should stick to giving gay kids haircut rapes, because Turkey has the second largest army in all of NATO, after only the US. If that's "small," what would "big" be?
When I was in Beirut, I was surprised to learn that Arabs felt insecure because there was not a single Arab great power capable of doing much more than defend its own borders (if even that). No Arab powers-- not even in the Middle East? No, I was told by a professor. There are three great powers in the Middle East, but not a single one of them is Arab. One is Israel -- obviously not Arab. One is Iran. They're Persians. And one is Turkey, who are not Arabs but Turks.
Anyway, it's strange to hear Mitt Romney, America's Number One Geopolitical Foe, get something so absurdly wrong as to call Turkey, one of the three Great Powers of the Middle East, a "small country" that we don't need to pay no mind to.
Quick funny story from Tim Pool, explaining why social media "fact-checking" is trash -- it's because they rely on trash outlets, like CNN and MSNBC (and the SPLC and Snopes!), to decide what is true and what is not true, despite CNN and MSNBC being absurdly biased and wrong more often than right.
The quick story he tells (about a minute long) is about Wikipedia's insistence that he himself "invented a zeppelin" -- something some trash outlet made up. It's not derogatory -- who wouldn't want to be credited as a zeppelin inventor? -- but it's completely false and without even a some distorted factual basis.
But no matter how many times Pool tells them "I never invented any zeppelin, you should delete that," they keep the false zeppelin-inventing biographical point, because Tim Pool is not considered a "credible source" on Tim Pool's zeppelin-inventing career or lack of same.
HuffPo says you invented a zeppelin, and who are you compared to the warriors of truth we know as HuffPo?
PBS "News" Hour "journalist" is very, very angry that Trump... posted a respectful remembrance of Elijah Cummings?
Psst, little open secret: It's the Paul Ryan types who keep PBS and NPR funded. Everything for the Suburban Wine Moms.
Video about your eyes' and brain's own color-correction function -- in other words, explaining the "What Color Is This Dress?" controversy
Even if you remember the gist of the explanation about the blue-black or white-gold dress, this video is still sort of illuminating (pun intended)
They gimmicked up another case of colors looking different to different people. This video can help you see something in ambiguous lighting in two different ways.
By the way, it worked for me.
SJW Fascist: Let's ban children's Stormtrooper costumes Because Nazi and Because Trump
This is inspired by Ivanka Trump's son wearing the costume. Now it's #problematic and must be #cancelled.
Tim Pool: YouTube is suppressing all videos which mention James O'Keefe's sting videos, imposing Chinese-style speech restrictions to make James O'Keefe officially Unmentionable and erased from all public discussion
All hail our Social Media Monopoloy Overlords. Who just happen to be working to protect Legacy Media Overlords.
Tim Pool also notes in this video that Twitter is refusing to give primary challengers a Blue Check, which the incumbents already have, delivering a huge advantage to incumbents and a big disadvantage to challengers.
Recent Entries
The Morning Rant: Minimalist Edition
Mid-Morning Art Thread
The Morning Report - 10/22/19
Monday Overnight Open Thread (10/21/19)
The Soyciety Pages
Etymologies of All the Old-Timey Synonyms For "Whore" Found in the Dungeon Masters Guide "Random Harlot Encounters" Table
Air Canada Will No Longer Address Passengers As "Ladies and Gentlemen," In Order to Respect the 0.1% of Mentally Unwell People Who Say They're Both, or Neither, or Maybe Unicorns
Mark Hemingway: Is the Anti-Trump "Resistance" Just the Attempt of the Ruling Class/Establishment/Managerial Class to Give Legitimacy to Their Worldview of Socially-Favored Fictions?
Mitt Romney's Secret Twitter Account Is Full NeverTrump and Retweets Lots of Liberals; Name Is Play on in pari delicto, "Both sides to blame"
People Are Getting Very Sick of the "Extinction Rebellion" and Other Enviro-Antifa Groups
Recent Comments
N.L. Urker. I will urk until I can't urk anymore. : "Is it now James W**d? ..." [view]

Mike Hammer, etc., etc.: "Hadrian - Keep us informed. Are you doing this on ..." [view]

grammie winger: "Steven Green has a post at PJ Media about Rolling ..." [view]

JoeF.: "Jack Chick comics were a hoot though.... ..." [view]

Mr Aspirin Factory: "I liked the Bond film Octo*****. ..." [view]

JoeF.: "How about Cox? Is that too close for comfort? ..." [view]

Broseidon - New Work Computer, Same Work Ethic: "Jack Chick was right about Dungeons and Dragons th ..." [view]

Ben Had: "creeper, darling you were in all of our hearts. ..." [view]

JoeF.: "D*** Trickle ..." [view]

Mr Aspirin Factory: "**** Cheney. Is this how it works now? ..." [view]

JackStraw: ">>Women's place is to serve and obey men, period. ..." [view]

Bertram Cabot, Jr.: " [i]Steven Green has a post at PJ Media about Rol ..." [view]

creeper: "G' morning, BenHad.  I had a great time at th ..." [view]

CN: "That sounds like Kaballistic crap. Posted by: Cha ..." [view]

reason: "That sounds like Kaballistic crap. Posted by: ..." [view]


Bloggers in Arms

Talk Of The Town with Steve Noxon
American Digest
The Anchoress
Belmont Club
Betsy's Page
The Bitch Girls
Blackfive, Paratrooper of Love
Blonde Sagacity
California Conservative
Chicago Boyz
Classical Values
Cold Fury
The Country Store
Cowboy Blob
Cranky Neocon
Da Goddess
Daily Lunch
Daily Pundit
The Daily Recycler (Vidblog)*
Daleks Weblog
Daly Thoughts
Ilyka Damen
Damn the Man
Dave Munger
Dave's Not Here
Dawn Eden
Day by Day (Cartoon)
Demure Thoughts
Enter Stage Right
Eternity Road
Dean Esmay
The Fat Guy
File It Under
Ghost of a Flea
Grim's Hall
Hell in a Handbasket
Victor Davis Hanson
Hugh Hewitt
The House of Payne
JamieR (Classics)
Just One Minute
Le Sabot Post-Moderne
Lileks/The Bleat
Likelihood of Confusion Law Blog
Michelle Malkin
Memeorandum (Metablog) Mind of Mog
My Pet Jawa
Oh, That Liberal Media
Outside the Beltway
Patterico's Pontifications
The Perfect World (Discussion Forum)
The People's Cube
New Hampshire Review
Protein Wisdom
The Pundit Guy
Q & O
Riehl Worldview (Carnivorous Conservative)
Say Anything Blog
Seraphic Press
Roger L. Simon
Six Meat Buffet
Ten Fingers Six Strings
Traction Control/US Citizen
Two Crackas in My Soup
Twisted Spinster
An Unamplified Voice (Music/Opera)
Viking Pundit
The Wardrobe Door
White Pebble (Politics/Poetry)
Whitney Gaskell (Author)
Michael Williams/Master of None
Faces From Ace's
The Rogues' Gallery.
Syndicate this site (XML)

Powered by
Movable Type 2.64

ę On Postponing the Election | Main | Ace of Spades Gets Results... Sort Of Ľ
July 13, 2004

More on Josh Marshall's Breathless Fakery as It Develops

One of my biggest beefs with hyperpartisan hack Joshua Micah Chesterton Taggart Claude-Patrice Herkemer Marshall is the way he breathlessly promises he'll have some amazing scoop... later. Always later.

Never now.


Maybe later.

Later today or later this week?

I don't know. Sometime later.

Soon later or later later?

Later. Be sure to check back regularly.

Zonitic has done a Man's Job and tracked down a whole series of Joshua Micah Etcetera Marshall's claims about the the next big story he's about to break wide open...

... and finds that he's either the world's biggest dupe or else simply a bit of a huckster. How can he keep promising that he "knows" this or that, and that it will be breaking soon/tomorrow/next Shivouis, and yet so infrequently actually deliver?

And furthermore-- how can he never apologize or retract his previous claims?

Let me say that during the height of impeachment fever, conservatives were always thinking that there was going to be this or that huge scandal about to break wide open. Quite frankly, Drudge did an awful lot of expectations-raising... but even Drudge never actually committed himself to the extent Marshall does several times per month, sometimes declaring that he actually "knows" something and predicting his secret knowledge would be revealed momentarily.

Unlike Drudge -- who famously ends every snippet with breathless, but very vague, sign-outs like a DEVELOPING or IMPACTING or DEVELOPING HARD WITH FURIOUS IMPACT -- Marshall has made representations about his own personal knowledge of important facts. See the latest on Plamegate.

Furthermore, Drudge is, self-admittedly, a bit of a PT Barnum-type character. But Marshall has pretenses of being part of the respectable media, and playing by their rules. He's better than us, see-- he's almost a real journalist.

Do real journalists hype these sorts of breathless cliffhangers on a regular basis, and then never correct their errors or at least explain why their latest Watergate never quite materialized?

How many times is Marshall allowed to do this before we can begin calling him an outright fabulist?

If not a fabulist, he's the blogosphere's pre-eminent source for vapornews. Vapornews is just like vaporware-- long anticipated, much hyped. And yet never quite reaching the marketplace.

Thanks to Andrew Sullivan, who I occasionally read so that you don't have to.

Never Waste a Good Premise Update! Check out Joshua Micah Etcetera Marshall's explanation as to why he can't tell you right now all this amazing information he has at his fingertips:

I cannot begin to describe how much I would like to say more than that. And at some later point in some later post I will do my best to explain the hows and whys of why I can't. But, for the moment, I can't.

Let me, however, offer a hypothetical that might help make sense of all this.

Let's say that certain individuals or organizations are responsible for some rather unfortunate misdeeds. And let's further postulate that such hypothetical individuals or organizations find out that some folks are on to them, that a story is in the works -- perhaps more than one -- and that it's coming right at them. Those individuals or organizations -- as shorthand, let's call them 'the bad actors' -- might well start trying to fight back, trying to gin up an alternative storyline to exculpate themselves and inculpate others. If that story made its way into the news, at a minimum, it might help the bad actors muddy the waters for when the real story comes out. You can see how such a regrettable turn of events might come to pass.

This is of course only a hypothetical. But I thought it might provide a clarifying context.

A bit labrynthine and murky, yes-yes? Could mean anything. Probably means exactly nothing.

Well, it just so happens that I, too, happen to have an incredible scoop that will pop all of your eyes out of your skulls. Let's just say that I have it on good authority -- good authority; Johnny Coldcuts type authority -- that a certain high-level Iraqi prisoner is about to tell all about Saddam's WMD program, and that famous Prague meeting between the IIS and Mohammad Atta, and that his statements will surprise and delight you.

Now, I can't say more than that right now. Believe me, I'd love to say more. And at some future time I'd dearly like to explain how I've come into this bombshell information, giving you a whole tick-tock of my intrepid skulduggery in Baghdad.

But, for the moment, I can't.

Let me, however, offer a hypothetical which might help make sense of this all.

Let's say, hypothetically, that your wife one evening informs you that she wants you to purchase her a new duck. It's not important why she feels she needs this new duck; let's just say that either your current duck is constantly in the shop for repairs, or else your wife doesn't find it stylish or sporty enough, and seeks an expensive new duck which will demonstrate a level of sophistication and status that your current duck does not.

And let's further postulate that you take your current duck and jump into your El Camino half-truck and drive to your local duck dealership. And as you're driving, your duck says to you --

The duck talks. I mentioned that, right? The entire hypothetical depends on that. I guess I should have made that clear from the get-go.

Anyway: Talking duck. Accept it.

So your duck says to you, "Hey, why don't we cruise by the railroad tracks?," which is where the hookers hang out. This is not unexpected behavior from your duck, since he's a notorious ass-chaser.

And you tell him, no, you don't have time for that, and the duck wants to know where you're going then, but you can't tell him, because he'll get upset and you think you might cry when you tell your duck you're going to trade him in, and he'll probably wind up being owned by some desperately poor banana-picker down in the Dominican Republic, which would really be a blow to the duck, since he doesn't speak Spanish and is furthermore virulently racist against Domincans.

And so you pull your car up to the duck-dealership, and you wipe away a tear as you think about the upcoming confrontation, but your duck doesn't notice where you are, or the rows of gleaming new ducks on sale in the lot, because he's got his head out the window trying to pick up a chubby fifteen-year-old Puerto Rican girl wearing a tube-top and a microskirt reading Muy Caliente by telling her he's a "roving photographer" for Penthouse.

And at that moment, you decide that damnit, you like this duck, and you turn the wheel of your car hard and speed home before your duck has a chance to see the duck dealership (but after he's gotten la nina to show him her bra).

And, hypothetically, let's say you get home, and proudly carry your duck into your house, ready for a big argument with your wife, but when you get into the bedroom, you see her in there getting banged up the squeaker by Emmy-award winning actor Tony Shaloub of Monk.

And that doesn't bother you so much, because you've always been a big fan of Mr. Shaloub's work, but what really sticks in your craw is that your duck then asks, "Mind if I join in?"

But that's not what really bothers you, because you've come to expect that from him; no, what really bothers you is that, in response to your duck's request for a bestiality-flavored menage a trois, your wife shoots your duck an icy look and says "I told you last night -- it's over between us, Geoffrey."

Oh, the duck's name is Geoffrey. I guess I should have mentioned that earlier, too.

Anyway, to complete the analogy: At that moment you realize your entire marriage is a lie. And, also, that your wife has been fucking a waterfowl.

As that hypothetical demonstrates, then, informing you any more about my big Iraq WMD tip would cause a whole chain of regrettable consequences.

This is of course only a hypothetical. But I thought it might provide a clarifying context.

posted by Ace at 02:41 AM